IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-06

Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> Thu, 15 August 2019 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2201120052 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MvF4xT5g9lme for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081BA120071 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Aug 2019 07:56:26 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,389,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="194778741"
Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.128]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2019 07:56:25 -0700
Received: from tjmaciei-mobl1.localnet (10.251.11.19) by ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:56:25 -0700
From: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:56:23 -0700
Message-ID: <2845175.7IlyYNWCq8@tjmaciei-mobl1>
Organization: Intel Corporation
In-Reply-To: <156587646384.15832.10776769526244223381.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <156587646384.15832.10776769526244223381.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Originating-IP: [10.251.11.19]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/r_KgzTwQM0Qsu0D-vt50wKIuwrM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-06
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:57:50 -0000

On Thursday, 15 August 2019 06:41:03 PDT Francesca Palombini via Datatracker 
wrote:
> Francesca Palombini has requested publication of
> draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-06 as Informational on behalf of the CBOR
> working group.
> 
> Please verify the document's state at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags/

What's the correct procedure to request that bfloat16 be considered before the 
RFC is published?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel System Software Products

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email