Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7144)
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 07 October 2022 22:53 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07140C14F730 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Twjnqa58jSpc for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CCAFC14F734 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 15:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (ipv6.dooku.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:6::1]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C0781F459; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 22:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1665183182; bh=Bb3e74u6KbWIYLmw4cvS3G2uZHiBjtg0aM1DVhAU8Vg=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=Q/7ToVsIjcaOvmOjRmaqupjg7TWwhxsKyFSMZee3/BhTa2CVzB2jxEYaQ7KrLYF6Q 9THKYJuSL5XFDzvQiULC1/hZaHbGfq18zNZdGAq/pF7KIhxKOwlTAgFsG53EAJjHk8 lZP/hRE4CVJJ7sY6yZycvlGIAH3dYk4nEG/cUdSDLlNpGHNHLknvjx5iLQGIh3ME3k HHqur6XJCxqDkmCr4GPnGyIsY5KbIkXTURaMtABiL4LpbZ1sHGoyX2B6upvAVKd/wN Eb1XUoo6OKpSPnAf6er0v+6n8+AUxTJ5hBo09LeZ23HRO4YDWOmtI51dwD5hs5oBOy WW3RGPRO8uQlQ==
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id CAD0F1A0761; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 00:53:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>, cbor@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-reply-to: <32463B2C-4AA8-4437-97D1-BC87D1607FF8@tzi.org>
References: <20221004144918.78F076AAD5@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CALaySJ+uQUxDToXimCcz6Ey-8_3SyXFZeZXgfgUdy_qzWkUxKQ@mail.gmail.com> <32463B2C-4AA8-4437-97D1-BC87D1607FF8@tzi.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> message dated "Tue, 04 Oct 2022 17:10:30 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 18:53:00 -0400
Message-ID: <235440.1665183180@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/rjPTyd3aeIc1uQaLEnnAB3jU5ms>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7144)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 22:53:11 -0000
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> Indeed, this looks almost right, but I think the correction is meant
>> to be "[RFC 8742]". Carsten, Michael?
> No, really, the reference was to Section 2.3 (“2.3. Enveloping Method:
> Labeled CBOR Sequence”, which certainly uses RFC 8742, but describes a
> specific way to use it):
Yes, that's what it should be.
- [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7144) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9277 (7… Francesca Palombini