IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] hildjj/cbor-map-entries: Explicit Map datatype for CBOR, in array format

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 18 February 2021 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675FA3A15BB for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:39:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXzt-Zo4FWj5 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E94C3A17EB for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43471389B8; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:43:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id U2yUnTPlkTex; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:43:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56BF389B2; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:43:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED96612F; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:39:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CA182161-D902-4B9B-9AD7-B3FA20AD47FC@tzi.org>
References: <CA182161-D902-4B9B-9AD7-B3FA20AD47FC@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:39:15 -0500
Message-ID: <17723.1613669955@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/rtN6n6ELYDK07O9SFovrjXBySyg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] hildjj/cbor-map-entries: Explicit Map datatype for CBOR, in array format
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:40:04 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > Do we agree that an order-preserving map occurs often enough to warrant
    > a 1+1 (or even 1+0?) tag?

1+1 definitely.
1+0? maybe.

    > The current proposal is 1+2.
    > (Any other comments?)
    > https://github.com/hildjj/cbor-map-entries

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email