IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Question about draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-08 abnf

Daniel P <danielaparker@gmail.com> Fri, 17 May 2019 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <danielaparker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2BF1200E5; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlOhQOUOAWo1; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2275120046; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id v69so2372866vke.0; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gOfYpTcXrR1diGgkv7J3tmT+GFaGWikl3BNWZgNkOeQ=; b=iE46kba9ggTlJaGdAUAKsNVCChqWevLs7SjfUe+UjsSwMJjrjJPMG1CVWRX6en2vUX JKIrR3q/7Db3b0WssYh8IQd/FW9D1qfKZ6r+TbL2+MhdaHlQi5EN0Ow4ryq/Xoh3vpUC N+6/gFBxDR8bmA1f6487bxb5pOiszX+MGgUy31/pgtzCqZcsQly8xmKpEPAY6Gg2VrU1 osJMSy7tU/2l7v6h7OwRVAIhBPEnw5LC+EA7wXmDBr9zomZMzA3sRjetEYxu+fHOrp5i 16u7KyS18T4F/lcqSAHDs5rqoeKHHPYE4FVUU5V1oTvJn5QOLfssE8iWND52mBHgt/9b FMag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gOfYpTcXrR1diGgkv7J3tmT+GFaGWikl3BNWZgNkOeQ=; b=mxGevfFrXA3joQmGhH8jTA2PIYny2SSjhyRqwCbr2ljvPf5IiDPT6nbQlwIxUD/9Ga 6T2UxRWZ9/yIkAhvjVS0pOpIwgotqJqRa0S3+hKY8NRxdGMW71+/Fd+udyuCyjwGpTwW IiHabzO7qsjK1rzeOnOYop3ylM6fH9SqeY6aI/g2Lz8PhDAFzLoIIaCDf4HVBp/rmpoT Q7PmiUYQWClh7hblJ5zOO1Ku07qqO9i1T2j+OlG7Y48TFR6d5VQZAYofE3Z+rFZdxqFl oBUGYxDbcD8vFJaTQl9mlMIS70YYkVslqnJFgEkNXDSR+ilsEHAZeLBeY8KokLrvsU+W IKWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXRHTFtio5jPB2bDruKkotPSytbTL3dRaECHlvrwX842W9msnzR vZIYrsG4tmd3yW2ObrLtQgqu3QvynKqz7Lsakc/NlFCu
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8RhpSlEj76VJzLC6JQYRZQs4Kc4DbAv10B3ZHXm4TsRgYi0bL88aX6eAu/SndE3CNG+AvaHOrtrjAe9y/Kkk=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:30d4:: with SMTP id w203mr544048vkw.0.1558125461467; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel P <danielaparker@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:37:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+mwktJhp6=Opb8G8pBF=64Ye8_oEssOZp1UOgf_MiHoA6R=Yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-cbor-cddl@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/sg5dpdCjaPw7mtohdAWCWgnQdMk>
Subject: [Cbor] Question about draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-08 abnf
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 20:37:44 -0000

Regarding

hexfloat = "0x" 1*HEXDIG ["." 1*HEXDIG] "p" exponent

should hexfloat allow an optional leading minus sign? C/C++ allows that.

Thanks,
Daniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email