Re: [Cbor] List of not-well-formed CBOR and test vectors

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Sun, 04 August 2019 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA10F1200F7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9FXzDoINQy-J for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E06E9120143 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.4] ([174.222.134.146]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id u403hoLXTTk8Eu404hztMv; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 17:03:48 -0700
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Message-Id: <5DF93FE7-8149-4D35-B57C-97ECAD3D2D17@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F4B55C0F-A657-41AA-A767-70CC4481B8E5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:02:56 -0700
In-Reply-To: <8209861E-F3F8-46B5-9B0A-920984C1CD0B@tzi.org>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <CF3F871E-7489-4770-B2FE-1746C392ACF0@island-resort.com> <985940F3-3C57-4A93-8568-C9B9CCE9A3FF@island-resort.com> <8209861E-F3F8-46B5-9B0A-920984C1CD0B@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBk3ZkI4fyt9NmjmKmsx/A47J1YssSr87yVlsMlTdJeqO5uotvAyzC5nqwMgqqizqPiCZ5dpcsXhKaoqwisZ9xy7uSXpY15GGKXHQbVE6AklOUwmF7p7 nVDCb6pVXK89G9hzeJwOSHWoF/J01VMC6gtAvdAbW6qkkE/ppBGdr7YeC0lD381vnPdgVi2qlHlNYA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/st2gJvHtLMX0oabTVwnjwrOwEIE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] List of not-well-formed CBOR and test vectors
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 00:03:52 -0000

> On Aug 3, 2019, at 10:07 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; wrote:
> 
> On Aug 3, 2019, at 18:54, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com <mailto:lgl@island-resort.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Will turn this in to an appendix for CBORbis in about a week. 
> 
> Do you think the test vectors need to be in the document?
> I’d rather leave them in a resource that directly can be used by implementers.

I was thinking both. The RFC is so much more widely available and read than any .h file or such that I think it is worth putting them in. I was thinking an appendix, formatted in a three column table so it doesn’t take up pages.

LL