IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-06.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 17 November 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E112E3A0124 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:29:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8r9IAP6VxPDe for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63ADB3A0120 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a436.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.164.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HvXzk3m2Rz2xZt; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:29:06 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <21617.1637175001@localhost>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:29:06 +0100
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 658870146.066087-c0dfbee3eddf73faf744124179782c52
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BE2710C5-E8B4-4649-9259-A31C26A030F9@tzi.org>
References: <163484662604.2786.6905890868276647458@ietfa.amsl.com> <YYKYIzFFIGWVqNK8@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <21617.1637175001@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/tlwa1sy6ZU9FNib1hP2XASA_Ku4>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-06.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 19:29:15 -0000

On 2021-11-17, at 19:50, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> I think that we have now resolved (in the WG meeting) the situation about
> magic numbers for all Content-Formats vs non-CBOR, but I'm unclear what the
> resolution exactly was in the end.  (cbor WG vs another WG conflict too)

I’m planning to write it up when we’ve done the next step over in the CORE WG on CORECONF…

(This was a very productive IETF, but unfortunately also productive in Action Items…)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email