IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Minutes posted for the CBOR session at IETF 111

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 02 August 2021 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8773A07E0 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFr_LGIYSc_R for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66FE13A07DF for <cbor@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id g13so34487114lfj.12 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LpgOmIITuHAq5YpZ5Z7TiPXyHrAx25MbS6E1IbXsBc8=; b=hAvKFRnQGJlQX52+J0okjH/xg9pfNnBvm9q5jr1cIorNGBjBTPs5EQFgOeghzyks+q F60/76IG3M/lPzokGx0b45fJaUvfCtsa5ihY0sMW/sWmB2fIIUE9TBQUTcL8WBv3I7I0 lPXMdx0RXQYmV2qyGgfHI1CpDmmPqrhuImuYO6kooeApzNts1NPV2ZxgOraYsixPaiR3 L2RDtKpdWoeMN1TWAMcpiTtrkPL15f338FzDOnmuE8PnVGGl4ej/QsJLEiOui6ofXXgu lyrZQdTGXQ09/VghIAgvjB2JnOuZLp1YAqqj2nIzDixOBABTV0vS8n+x6FsRYogpXVXg +5Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GWci7b8KAK4AA9FWDgWu33pp8HClGcTuMAFd04IDUZ+ZkPZ+C FimyI++HLklx/QLUKJora+6r9viyKcvs90HT2FU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwntgzabCSHsTna4gBIc9hGB2xUaOFDeHYGCWhZgzbSaRdzozTEbJGCyMJnVEgb+3etPemJiBeehbnSb5eI7hY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:532d:: with SMTP id f13mr13146515lfh.123.1627919593723; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 08:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJK1mbyyWeUj_iFNrLZbRCLzhUO6eSNORHDgW1nQuOK3og@mail.gmail.com> <5C9BCBB9-A0B8-49E6-B30A-57C44639AEBF@tzi.org> <CALaySJLUruup+-PZ7nTSo9dwWD8q+Mm2LJf9c3UR8Lgj8doRFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLUruup+-PZ7nTSo9dwWD8q+Mm2LJf9c3UR8Lgj8doRFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 11:53:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+d-iD4DHQSO5xwYjoeJu0Jatrhn2DTMgqqYarYD0=XyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/uauxnHMLsfvvvmWQy7mggLz8oVs>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Minutes posted for the CBOR session at IETF 111
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:53:21 -0000

I've fixed this (and the run-together text) and re-posted.  Use this
link to always get the latest version:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/minutes-111-cbor

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:20 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>
> I don't think the note "together with" was intended to mean "in sync".
> I think it was just meant to say that they're both moving forward, and
> I intend to request publication of network-address today or tomorrow.
>
> Barry
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:14 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-08-02, at 16:50, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/minutes-111-cbor-00
> >
> > Did we really say we want to move file-magic and network-address in sync?
> > My brain tells me that we were ready to advance the latter (independent of the former, which thankfully now also has John’s review), but I haven’t watched the video.
> >
> > Grüße, Carsten
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CBOR mailing list
> > CBOR@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email