IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-02 - handling of time zone offsets

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 01 July 2020 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627693A0C77; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 02:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wF-DgFz2lE6H; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505183A0C6B; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49xb225K6vz100G; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:06:34 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <18fefc08-b407-8925-5d1a-f35cf4a844ef@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:06:34 +0200
Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 615287194.246299-a77a7410acf4c08e9249d5c35b3e2ef7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E577B9FF-5DE8-4981-B982-99C284E24CD4@tzi.org>
References: <20200701072123.hnyhzemagtotnuyl@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <DD477DBD-3F3F-48FA-BADC-FF550CC3D4F7@tzi.org> <18fefc08-b407-8925-5d1a-f35cf4a844ef@sit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/vFRVNwHvVj__E5B-wB-gLzbRkn4>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-02 - handling of time zone offsets
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 09:06:40 -0000

On 2020-07-01, at 10:44, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> 
> Both calendars and timescales can share the same epoch, though.

Not sure that statement is pedantically correct, but yes.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email