Re: [Cbor] Do we care about array-tags issue 6, clamped-uint8 arrays?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 25 July 2019 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FE61201EB for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOOy6VaC2CKR for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85ADC12001E for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9abf.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9abf.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.154.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45vKXf5774zyff; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 06:50:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <3246C0B0-C5BF-4AC8-B99F-D9A44B780A2C@seantek.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:50:41 -0400
Cc: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 585723039.095157-c0ade9c7b68e6269f5118c8e2a13c40d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DECE061A-328D-4B1B-BEB5-D73F5779B554@tzi.org>
References: <CANh-dXkkSJUOcHcBj1JRO20ULFVNNbu1GQU-j7bR7N-FCTt3HA@mail.gmail.com> <24038E27-C30B-47F4-91E8-68C02FCAE26D@tzi.org> <CANh-dXm0TLShk_9DT9fKq0CR4yJMr6=zntWL8fW2tB99o0Et3Q@mail.gmail.com> <3246C0B0-C5BF-4AC8-B99F-D9A44B780A2C@seantek.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/wZCin149A0Aw--ReAeyhUd0wZQE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Do we care about array-tags issue 6, clamped-uint8 arrays?
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 04:50:46 -0000

On Jul 24, 2019, at 19:53, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>; wrote:
> 
> having the tags assigned

Too late, they already are assigned.

(If you think this shouldn’t have happened, please consider the WG’s current stance on changing the IANA considerations on 1+1 tags away from specification required.)

Grüße, Carsten