From nobody Wed May 31 09:11:11 2023
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBFCC14CE46
 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2023 09:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 2iopesw1Fxor for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 31 May 2023 09:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68062C14CE2C
 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2023 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc0f6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [84.141.192.246])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QWZ4g4LM9zDCdx;
 Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZHducp0jYdjNthbE@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 18:10:59 +0200
Cc: Christopher Allen <christophera@lifewithalacrity.com>, cbor@ietf.org,
 Wolf McNally <wolf@wolfmcnally.com>, Shannon.Appelcline@gmail.com
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 707242259.227636-2fdfe6ffe1c2a1c9cc75dbbeca3681d2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <59ADDAA3-EACF-4D10-934F-A18311815BB7@tzi.org>
References: <CAAse2dEFB_FVP6_KkNANSYPW+yX4-M9pN3YkUq5=FTgLZnyWGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZHducp0jYdjNthbE@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Christian_Ams=C3=BCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/xRGQyi8CLj_sBcPlX2eQip8afdU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] draft-mcnally-deterministic-cbor: rationale for not
 going with pre-encoded data (was: Updated Drafts for dCBOR I-D and Gordian
 Envelope Structured Data Format I-D [...])
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:11:10 -0000

I think the strongest argument I have heard for signing data at rest is =
that this may be the result of multiple updates and operations, so it =
never was interchanged as such, and so no data in flight exists.  (There =
may also be transforms=E2=80=A6  Dark corner.)

Imagine signing a current configuration in a YANG tree.

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten

