Re: [Cbor] network-address tags: suggested CDDL

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 26 June 2021 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C073A115E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5B_z4FazGGoG for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E4E3A1157 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GC7BZ0gQgz2xHS; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 00:01:58 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <81a7e846-0709-e9be-b747-fcb2e199c518@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 00:01:57 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 646437717.381477-f308dfb27e9891d7d746debb747d2259
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <675AD897-E93C-439E-AD32-90E4C076C4C9@tzi.org>
References: <DD4B125D-92CF-4AAA-8A8C-9256D96319FB@tzi.org> <81a7e846-0709-e9be-b747-fcb2e199c518@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/yJii6K9ee3IlWvmdliB1TwGMQfw>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] network-address tags: suggested CDDL
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:02:04 -0000

On 2021-06-26, at 22:56, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 26-Jun-21 23:45, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> I put in a PR with suggested CDDL for the network addresses.
>> https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-network-address/pull/3
>> 
>> This should be quick to review…
>> 
>> 
>> Should I do a PR for address-plus-prefix-length (netmask)?
> 
> Yes please.

Done:

https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-network-address/pull/4

(Builds on #3, to be merged first.)

Grüße, Carsten