From nobody Wed Oct 28 10:50:05 2020
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EA03A0A66
 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.912
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_BULK_SIG=0.001,
 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=1.886, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.922,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id wdPbseeLowTF for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de
 [134.102.50.17])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDE33A0924
 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0045.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0045.vpn.uni-bremen.de
 [134.102.107.45])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CLx132KjszyX1;
 Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:49:59 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FB5123AF-6651-4F62-8285-0FE73D4F5686@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:49:58 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 625600198.855976-fc97eae120f15af41bfe12b8462a5464
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <60607D68-D883-4E90-BDD0-EE6C1C1097F6@tzi.org>
References: <160149084739.1101.17252607624012498913@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <FB5123AF-6651-4F62-8285-0FE73D4F5686@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/yuGQFDUeB1YHSa8H4LjiW6wqii4>
Subject: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02 (Re: Going forward on
 draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-01.txt)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:50:04 -0000

On 2020-10-28, at 13:34, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>=20
> What is left to do is:
>=20
> =E2=80=94 tick off and delete the yellow editors=E2=80=99 comment at =
the end of Section 5:
> =
https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.h=
tml#name-tag-factoring-with-oid-arra =E2=80=94 i.e., agree that we now =
have reached the right level of complexity here.
> =E2=80=94 discuss whether we need the detail in =
https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.h=
tml#section-9.1 =E2=80=94 conversion between BER and dotted decimal is =
not exactly the focus of this draft any longer, and the third paragraph =
of Section 9 =
(https://raw.githack.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/master/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid.=
html#section-9-3) already contains a good warning about this.
>=20
> We could discuss this later today in the interim, generate a -02 with =
the above (and a few editorial) changes, and go for WGLC (which should =
get us any further reviews we need).

We did this, and based on the discussion I have now submitted -02:

Name:		draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid
Revision:	02
Title:		Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for =
Object Identifiers
Document date:	2020-10-28
Group:		cbor
Pages:		14
URL:            =
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02.txt
Status:         =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid/
Html:           =
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02.html
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02
Diff:           =
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-02

This should be ready for WGLC now, potentially discussion results of =
that at the IETF 109 meeting.

In the interim today, Ira mentioned that SACM and RATS might be good WGs =
to make aware of a WGLC, as a good collection of people who know about =
ASN.1 Object Identifiers is assembled there.

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten

