Re: [Cbor] Supporting IPv6 Link-Local with scope (was Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 07 October 2021 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907453A005C; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 18:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1kf4W-z5tFsP; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 18:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1846C3A003C; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 18:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089a8ac.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HPv9s43fLz2xjy; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 03:38:57 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <372df336-eb01-de6d-2e11-e094b9ff7cfd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 03:38:57 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, cbor@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B15F2A12-2A60-4456-9C8B-E4F155078613@tzi.org>
References: <163344085669.17315.998599560097016034@ietfa.amsl.com> <24367.1633460118@localhost> <1fcf3889-57d1-83f5-2913-51ae9155130b@gmail.com> <6442.1633537138@localhost> <9D5E9264-0A10-4A24-8F23-DB89EDE851B9@tzi.org> <9043.1633557346@localhost> <372df336-eb01-de6d-2e11-e094b9ff7cfd@gmail.com>
To: Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/zPMEFpZg6qFbbDDo0QGTE4XaVso>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:59:14 -0700
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Supporting IPv6 Link-Local with scope (was Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 01:39:05 -0000

On 7. Oct 2021, at 00:44, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That's probably because there are none. As far as I know, there is no
> "Scoped architecture for IPv4" RFC. I don't know why there is YANG support.

Zones are this gift that keeps on giving.

If we are doing zones, we need to do them like YANG.
I would have a strong objection against including them but then doing them differently.
Maybe we should simply reference RFC 6991 as well.

Jürgen:  Do you remember why ipv4-address has a zone ID (called “zone index”)?

Grüße, Carsten