[CCAMP]Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Roberto Manzotti <manzoro.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2024 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <manzoro.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD61C151538 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgiARrLcNOCg for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A3AC15108B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539fe76e802so6613445e87.1 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730212469; x=1730817269; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=TO5kUH646vc/ZLla13tppazyf7kVUQJW7UrsXBnWWbE=; b=f98Gny64sDaypbZFHmacHq9tw2QcAAEis8lfiSbUt8hjEcJ6NSG1vhC+8SeBlQ5ZK5 LWzCDdIwYuIC2TUHrVUAbS1Pfci5/eQO3/KE48JXe/BwX08zzqVx68bP0ZBfZgBsGIYt 9IpXLS+d6a6wq2mY4ZL/FPyleX2yeaCH5IpbFwQyWPV4Z93jX8KwGirBFZwCjdmQlLzn bet6OH/xDWjNkqCtBnddGRvsf8BfdQtSYr7FzdQfOGvjYozlpOSwSmg1b0rccxPA87Iv lqyB4P6EDtAEfMa4XQrsoEQay+ZrBJnzKIdspOlCv5r/905wDnQc9+PmojDiTd3wHG5Z oIFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730212469; x=1730817269; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TO5kUH646vc/ZLla13tppazyf7kVUQJW7UrsXBnWWbE=; b=CFxRPtqr4rXYL0jNrDwKtTxB5zgGfV9/Hg0HmUXhzf5wKq8KSzrIdkoaxZF4M3ntSk D3bEponA1/f7SmW6UeHSLfE/jjpb72V83HiK0E3/pulFnrv5dyS3XEdv+ucpgY414FJN DxnJLxpKl8shlbYQ5TgqKj6hKmKgckHHr+XqnWFlmjGER5cXwUFaYOljnds5TdaBMF6x ckI03nYxgp1PPe+MNJUxvdniac67x6S6Co2NyxUaIxMPJuifuh8en0VghGT/0oN+P7B6 TCRYyE62McWONlvhnG1eL4zfhrz/Zzfm5NwxM/3/hyS1Dsrlnz6uqsNzdtdn9GqSZd1Q enhg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWKZGN45I5WulV9I7rXWVBfLrihhuvN0RNHCtUooxljtF6uW2b/7sxlzT0Gau5fGYXbnwom0g==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyT7roHI0vwg4glNkgQTw1CU+r7WmN5kLCeBF8CTebc1PIYC3e5 df11QUL+X4Km3sOkaIqy0gWfW56uHJKhrCIem+PqwlMGEqVx0uWeueKhASZj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGpVTAjQnXPnmQz8fD9rLf1yu6NxxDKRG9fhP0uawzjZ6JM9GS6zJYBvnRfKSXY/9FLASqNfg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e1e:b0:52e:9762:2ba4 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53b348deabamr4475671e87.25.1730212468585; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CSCOWPF35GX4X ([2001:b07:5d2a:f84e:dd79:84ce:321c:3d4c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43193572932sm149276185e9.1.2024.10.29.07.34.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roberto Manzotti <manzoro.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "'Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)'" <dceccare=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, ccamp@ietf.org
References: <CY8PR11MB7340F9832E1B69281102A5E2D44C2@CY8PR11MB7340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR11MB7340F9832E1B69281102A5E2D44C2@CY8PR11MB7340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:34:24 +0100
Message-ID: <007701db2a0f$a6fb1370$f4f13a50$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0078_01DB2A18.08C08CE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQEovSOUKwOf8qAYuqt93rY/DQVXA7QCpGWw
Content-Language: en-us
Message-ID-Hash: FZUWZHX7ML7RACZQGP4VY2Y72GUFETWG
X-Message-ID-Hash: FZUWZHX7ML7RACZQGP4VY2Y72GUFETWG
X-MailFrom: manzoro.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ccamp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [CCAMP]Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/-MmXCFxBx6dkHPEd7j-VyKoX0vg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ccamp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ccamp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ccamp-leave@ietf.org>

Hello Daniele, chairs and WG,

 

I support the draft; it is mature and include all the YANG entities required
for modelling L0 networks.

 

Thanks

Roberto

 

From: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <dceccare=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 2:01 PM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP]WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

 

Hi CCAMP, 

 

-- IMPORTANT PREAMBLE--

We have two drafts which have a very good level of maturity, namely
RFC9093bis and Optical Impairment aware topology.

The more we work on them and the more disparate use cases pop up. We
requested the authors to have the drafts in a status that is "good enough"
to address the vast majority of use cases supported by the industry today so
that we can progresse the drafts to the next stage and not hold them
potentially for ever.

 

With the actual version of the drafts we should be able to cover all of the
use cases with only the following limitations:

 

*	Homogenous muxponders: with the present version of the draft we are
not able to support use cases of interoperability between muxponder of
different versions, and we can use regenerator always at the lowest level
(OTU) since we do not have client information when setting up a tunnel. This
information is missing today.
*	Client mapping compatibility: at the moment we can support optical
compatibility with operational model, but we don't support client
compatibility.

 

These use cases and others that might come to your mind, if really needed,
can be handled by an update to the RFCs at later stages.

- END PREAMBLE --

 

That said, this starts a 3 weeks working group last call on
draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11. 

 

The last call will last 3 weeks to provide more time for reviewing, given
we're approaching IETF 121 meeting. It will end on Tuesday November 12th .
Please indicate your support or concern to the mailing list. Review comments
and nits are also welcome.

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected
and can be found in the CCAMP WIKI page:
https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/ccamp

 

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd for this draft, please feel free to
volunteer (authors excluded). 

 

Thanks

Daniele, Fatai, Luis