Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 31 July 2013 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8211F21E80FD for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.915
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.685, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szqJy-vbWDTh for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [66.147.249.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B833121E80DD for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13461 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jul 2013 17:08:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2013 17:08:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=m58VrqfQeoLGlQQ+8sU6Juh9H9Xrv1Jz8xFbMc3tM3w=; b=QEQ3VHheKezvUGtzY3ym64XQJ9gUXvk24vyr5FDW+Jrzf7/uaIWWE3LKDt6qW5XRR/7ZLiY0WDpIVF6Zs9uwFRHG0qSgsFgxmZnNfzXXSbLnsdCOr8fw+G0MNWZ7PLlc;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:54749 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1V4ZtA-00028s-G4; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:08:40 -0600
Message-ID: <51F94497.8010402@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:08:39 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
References: <031c01ce8b87$45b79cb0$d126d610$@olddog.co.uk> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126BF3@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126BF3@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model@tools.ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:09:33 -0000

Daniele,
	See comments below.

On 07/31/2013 06:28 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
...
>> -----Original Message-----
...
>> As I asked in my email to the CCAMP list, I find it odd that this document makes
>> no reference to RFC 5307 and the use of IS-IS as a routing protocol in GMPLS
>> control of OTN.
>>
>  
> At the end of the intro we added the following sentence:
> "  As far as it concerns routing, analogous considerations apply to IS-IS
>   [RFC5307] but in the following only a gap analysis with respect to OSPF-TE is provided."
> 

Given that the analysis for 5307 is pretty similar to 4203, I think you
should take a pass at including it as well.  I'm happy to
review/contribute as needed.

Thanks,
Lou (chair & doc shepherd)