IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] 答复: Raw notes available for review/comment

Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D481E1A00B4 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:52:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.204
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VVJFNa-PN6qG for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13C61A0140 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:52:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BBU85165; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:52:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:48:17 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.36) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:48:48 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.15]) by SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 00:48:43 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>, Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Raw notes available for review/comment
Thread-Index: AQHPOUBQ92vsLtmabEiTq8DGlgEuXZrTshOAgAADq4CAAIzSUA==
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:48:42 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CAD5819@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <5318786E.6000903@labn.net> <650AA355E323C34D9D4AAEED952E053D3FC6BACE@SV-EXDB-PROD2.infinera.com> <53189EF1.9080202@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <53189EF1.9080202@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.122.219]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CAD5819SZXEMA504MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/-pUZNBCT_CH4TTbqsNs8rS7p-Gg
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] 答复: Raw notes available for review/comment
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:52:51 -0000

Hi Rajan,

I think your question is a general question, and should be out of scope of “LSP diversity” topic, :)

However, there are lots of approaches for CE to know why “PE1” should be picked up besides the way mentioned by Dieter below, e.g, qualified TE information (besides reachability) known by CE, manual configuration, or PCE can help as described in draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-uni-app<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-uni-app-05.txt>.


Thanks
Fatai



发件人: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dieter Beller
发送时间: 2014年3月7日 0:15
收件人: Rajan Rao
抄送: CCAMP
主题: Re: [CCAMP] Raw notes available for review/comment

Hi Rao,
On 06.03.2014 17:01, Rajan Rao wrote:

Authors of 'lsp-diversity',  'uni-extensions' & 'route-exclusion-pathkey'



My question on your uses cases was the following:

How does CE know which PE to talk to for the first LSP setup?  What is the assumption?
assuming that the CE does not have any information other than the destination CE is reachable via
both PEs , it will just pick one arbitrarily.


Thanks,
Dieter







Thx Lou for session notes.

Thx

Rajan



-----Original Message-----

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger

Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:30 PM

To: CCAMP

Subject: [CCAMP] Raw notes available for review/comment



All,

        Please take a look at the raw minutes in etherpad (link below) and correct as you see fit.  Note these are *unreviewed/raw* notes.



Much thanks,

Lou

Link -

http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-89-ccamp?useMonospaceFont=true



_______________________________________________

CCAMP mailing list

CCAMP@ietf.org<mailto:CCAMP@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp



_______________________________________________

CCAMP mailing list

CCAMP@ietf.org<mailto:CCAMP@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email