[CCAMP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

 I support Adam's DISCUSS.

It seems odd to find the terminology section before section 1.  Also, please
consider using the boilerplate from 8174, especially since there are lower case
instances of at least "should".

I think the reference to RFC5920 needs to be normative, since reading that
document seems necessary to understand the security considerations.