[CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 05 August 2015 11:48 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D8D1B2FD6; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 04:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JuP-_x-gsAzV; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 04:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A96E1B2FD2; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 04:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.3.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150805114849.13625.22352.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:48:49 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/0hebcbtClXzlMWw-NeSG3FM1L64>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:48:50 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have two (non-blocking) questions... I always get worried when the security considerations says "nothing to see here, move on, but if you must, do feel free to look at <other-rfcs>." That is sometimes a signal that nobody bothered to think about security, but only thought about how to try keep the security ADs quiet:-) Can you re-assure me that in this case, you did think about security? Is there any interesting new way in which abuse of these TLVs (either via direct insertion or else by causing them to be sort-of controlled by sending other traffic) can be used to control how traffic flows in a network so that the attacker can better control or predict through which nodes (or at which wavelengths) some traffic of interest (to the attacker) will flow? I'd say that the answer is probably not, but did you consider it?
- [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Stephen Farrell