IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers

Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Mon, 03 February 2014 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04521A03F7 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:46:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nMy-85ocdHK7 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from torres.puc.rediris.es (torres.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FD91ADEBE for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:33:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by torres.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>) id 1WAJeI-0007In-9c; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:33:18 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.123] (81.61.179.56.dyn.user.ono.com [81.61.179.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 090151FE2A; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:33:12 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es
Message-ID: <52EF9A9B.6040002@cttc.es>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:33:15 +0100
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>, Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Oscar González de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>, "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>
References: <CF1503FC.945B1%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF1503FC.945B1%zali@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:46:46 -0000

El 03/02/2014 14:29, Zafar Ali (zali) escribió:
> Hi-
>
> I am happy if we don't need to do so. But is this not better than
> defining/ extending a new label format when ITU-T changes the data plane?

Dear all,

I may be missing something (apologies in advance if it is the case) and 
since I don't have them here right now, for the sake of this discussion, 
maybe could anyone point to the relevant part of the document(s) e.g. 
G.694.1 / G.872 etc. where it is said that the value of m is bound to 256?
We are aware of the concept of frequency slot, nominal central 
frequencies (n, and their values) and the concept of frequency slot 
width, but I cannot recall now such a bound.

Thanks
R.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email