Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 23 August 2013 13:38 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1038C11E81B3 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95TVelrHzeo2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0161811E811D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23320 invoked by uid 0); 23 Aug 2013 13:38:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2013 13:38:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=crMkEanb+toC/Nm9wRPErwPfl7rKF0/CR/BJZxUXclg=; b=NveLsxwwp5wg3g/qP4rjLxD01yJWJtkr3qHjPX5dimUceUcYgo2ygmk+V8xthXxrf0m6hSQDQ9290uU4OQS6c6AJee62ULcXqpbnLGxVS69uKWgyO0cuHXF5O/isiE6H;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:59599 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1VCrZG-0002dI-8e; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:38:22 -0600
Message-ID: <521765CC.4030306@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:38:20 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <00a501ce9e5d$017b7ba0$047272e0$@olddog.co.uk> <52153E45.1030505@labn.net> <025701ce9f5c$185bcc80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <025701ce9f5c$185bcc80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update.all@tools.ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:38:51 -0000
Tom, See below. ... >> On 8/21/2013 6:55 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: ... >>> >>> Please add a note to the IANA considerations section to request an >>> update to >>> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib/ianagmplstc-mib.xhtml >>> >>> Possibly you should refer to it as IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB rather than > through >>> the URL. >> The proposed text to be added to the end of the section is: >> >> A parallel change to IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB is also required. In >> particular, under IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC a reference to this >> document should be added as item 3. Also the following changes > should >> be made to the related values: >> >> deprecated(2), -- Deprecated >> deprecated(3), -- Deprecated >> deprecated(4), -- Deprecated > > Mmmmm RFC4181 says > > "Therefore, labels of named numbers and named > bits MUST NOT be changed when revising IETF MIB modules (except to > correct typographical errors), and they SHOULD NOT be changed when > revising enterprise MIB modules. > " > > so I do not think that you can do that. Change of STATUS (which applies > to the whole TC) yes, label no. (Don't you love SNMP?) > > Tom Petch > Looks like you're right. Perhaps the following is the "right" middle ground: Existing: psc2(2), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 2 psc3(3), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 3 psc4(4), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 4 Revised: psc2(2), -- Deprecated [This.document] psc3(3), -- Deprecated [This.document] psc4(4), -- Deprecated [This.document] Adrian, Do you agree with the above? This is a bit different than your request. Much thanks, Lou
- [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-upda… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… t.petch
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-… t.petch