Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

"BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 31 October 2014 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6121A8703 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I70FaGWSxFHX for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 753951A8726 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 02:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 28343C3E42449; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9V9jU4J013389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:45:30 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.228]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:45:31 +0100
From: "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
Thread-Index: AQHP86/qCZJDVtfG1kWflBoWkMcmHJxJ9t2w
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:29 +0000
Message-ID: <B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F486D55059B@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/2F9z3M7n7ne1WtLGY5XroTGi6ik
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:45:41 -0000

Hi Lou,

1) Yes , I think it is a good work to clarify essential functionality.
2) reviewer
3) yes/support

Thanks
Sergio


-----Original Message-----
From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: mercoledì 29 ottobre 2014 20:38
To: CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

All,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group document.  The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting.

This is a bit of an atypical adoption call.  We, the chairs, think this document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should be directed by the WG.  Recall that the individual authors have already merged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp.  Our questions to the WG are:

1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document
   explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE
   RFCs/mechanisms?

   Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish.

2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how?

   Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or
   something else.

3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document
   as the basis for the topic?

   Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

   If indicating no, please state your objections to the document,
   keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it
   works its way through wg process.  Either way, also please feel
   free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption.

   Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1.

The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp