Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Fri, 09 August 2013 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CD621F999C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oll08qIjdw+r for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CD821F8F67 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9042; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1376078702; x=1377288302; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=IThFFCwPp+S6wOeTabX3Lx+f4UDPFPW66k1RUsgb1QQ=; b=MxTz6baI1yN1oTmsUCY9FR7sxAMIzHBes9+Dkg3XASwixTBMoYdkUzxN 9TTOhMm81lNbuE4cg1NO1HpWNd4AucNUJ8W7vAZm4AkJxg5GJhtxbJ9TG LeYCEmROEwD2/jgkkg2ex0z4wCdyibeHuJzHotTQnnhbtjr5cUbevk3xo w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFAP1KBVKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABbgkJENVCEMbFpiD2BHBZ0giQBAQEELUcFEgEIEQMBAgsdORQJCAEBBA4FCIgIDLhujmyBFQYHEw0EBwIEgxR1A5kMkCWDG4FxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,848,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="245697463"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2013 20:04:51 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r79K4odC005101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 20:04:51 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.69]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:04:50 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp
Thread-Index: Ac6VKrqe1S3WHJALTP2E78hex6qYMgAGVo0A
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 20:04:42 +0000
Message-ID: <B7D2A316AA32B6469D9670B6A81B7C243FA298@xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8355F58@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
x-originating-ip: [10.86.242.60]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B7D2A316AA32B6469D9670B6A81B7C243FA298xmbalnx07ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn" <jingrq@ctbri.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:13:02 -0000

Hi WG,

I am a co-author of this draft.

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.

Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2139/

Thanks,
Rakesh



From: <BRUNGARD>, DEBORAH BRUNGARD <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>
Date: Friday, 9 August, 2013 2:03 PM
To: "draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp@tools.ietf.org>>
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp
Resent-From: <draft-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org>>
Resent-To: "jingrq@ctbri.com.cn<mailto:jingrq@ctbri.com.cn>" <jingrq@ctbri.com.cn<mailto:jingrq@ctbri.com.cn>>, Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>>, "zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>" <zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>>
Resent-Date: Friday, 9 August, 2013 2:03 PM

Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

   If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

  If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
information, please see the RFCs listed above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
CCAMP WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.