From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02
 a	WG document
Thread-Index: AQHN1LxSK7+jK+HJxEmOnwi9cUiJTJgN1DNA
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:13:14 +0000
Message-ID: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF602DD02@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <50C25613.7030503@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <50C25613.7030503@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] poll on making	draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02
 a	WG document
Precedence: list

Not support

(At least not at this time)

There are a couple of technical issues:

1) I do not see any explanation of - or examples for - the use case where L=
SP attributes would apply to a=20
hop in an LSP and not to the entire LSP.  If attributes apply to an entire =
LSP, than there are existing ways
to do this. If it is possible to have an attribute that applies to a single=
 hop in the LSP, does this not raise
issues with "weak-links"?

2) I strongly suspect that this approach MUST rely on information present a=
t the signaling initiator that=20
would be "too much information" about nodes and links in the LSP-path.  Thi=
s information may change,
even between the time that the path is determined (by whatever means) and t=
he time that signaling is
initiated.

--
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of L=
ou Berger
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 3:48 PM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02 a=
 WG document

All,

This is to start a two week poll on making
draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02 a ccamp working group document. P=
lease send mail to the list indicating "yes/support"
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your technical rese=
rvations with the document.

The poll ends Friday December 21.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)

PS We're still waiting on one IPR statement.
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp