IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt

"Masanori Miyazawa" <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp> Tue, 17 April 2012 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85F721F858E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.083, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OIUQdBOPZzN for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C7821F8592 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC2B17480B3; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:03:11 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEltXGGAKqth; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:03:07 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.cn.kddilabs.jp (yellow.lan.kddilabs.jp [172.19.98.10]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B07417481A7; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:01:52 +0900 (JST)
Received: from miyazawaVAIO (unknown [172.19.64.90]) by mail.cn.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91431E0002; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:01:51 +0900 (JST)
From: Masanori Miyazawa <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp>
To: 'Ramon Casellas' <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>, ccamp@ietf.org
References: <20120414002417.13249.58136.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0AFCAE2C-9E4F-4E81-82A2-B13E9C27E843@ericsson.com> <4F8D1258.5000501@cttc.es>
In-Reply-To: <4F8D1258.5000501@cttc.es>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:01:49 +0900
Message-ID: <007c01cd1c78$ba379330$2ea6b990$@kddilabs.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQH1PIOwJEKglEOjaylgGNVvGYf79QIoFEG0AhQfmDWWLJL78A==
Content-Language: ja
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:03:23 -0000

Hi, Ramon

Thank you for your comment on this document.
As you mentioned, OSPF and ISIS (RFC 3630 and 5307) define byte per second
(not bit).

If there is no problem, we will modify the definition of UNIT from bit per
second to byte per second.	 
Any other comments about it?

Regards,
Masanori

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ramon Casellas
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:49 PM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt

El 14/04/2012 21:08, Acee Lindem escribió:
> As we discussed offline, this version addresses all my comments.
> Acee
Acee, authors, all,

Just a minor comment, shouldn't bandwidth values be in bytes per second 
(units) or I missed something ? (UNITS        "Bit per seconds" )

Thanks,
R.

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email