IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-01.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 04 March 2015 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F971A03A0 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 04:08:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zvvBYWiH2guu for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 04:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DC9B1A00F4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 04:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 8814 invoked by uid 0); 4 Mar 2015 12:07:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2015 12:07:56 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id zQ7j1p00q2SSUrH01Q7mG2; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 05:07:55 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bJKFfpOZ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=mlFM_a_ONtUA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=eG_VmA69nhXYRM8XVeAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=CH5ecAPAbB3N1BY1oGaw87FEN578R1/2spJJojqN0kk=; b=ggQsxI8UV0XBvsZUqW+fKeB2pANBvBKhsxAw/U/Z0rkKWacRg51x5mlLz0K8JRaaF2C2EPm4Wu5/WvkWfrW1GzONjgencN9hzD8jXDFUFq95+j7O/+jYDkTV8Ocenfjj;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:38299 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1YT85Y-0002pG-HP; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 05:07:44 -0700
Message-ID: <54F6F58A.2080103@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 07:07:38 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>, Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "'Zhangxian (Xian)'" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <005c01d055c9$03433cf0$09c9b6d0$@olddog.co.uk> <3820eb23b0a747ea9ff95e1a830d0676@sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com> <54F6D09E.80507@cttc.es> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481288D6FB@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <54F6EAE9.3000202@cttc.es> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481288D8BB@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE481288D8BB@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/4hDU2KdcG7WimShmCwlOfc1OQBY>
Cc: Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:08:02 -0000

Daniele,

On 3/4/2015 6:53 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
>
> Hi Ramon,
>
>  
>
> Yes, I think that was implicitly clear. BTW just to be sure, let’s
> call it frequency slot slot width, chunck of spectrum or water…just to
> make it explicit.
>
>  
>
> My point regards the quote of RFC4202 and RFC4203 where bandwidth
> means bandwidth and not portions of the spectrum.
>
>  
>

I'm not sure what you mean.  In the generic portion of the
advertisements defined in 4202/3, the available lambdas/timeslots/etc
(and perhaps now spectrum) have always been advertised as aggregate BW.  

Lou

> Daniele
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email