Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 29 October 2013 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5672621F9E3A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.081
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.776, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQMf+EfTSKrL for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.54.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CB20711E8228 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16063 invoked by uid 0); 29 Oct 2013 18:28:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2013 18:28:09 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=yHVJQQsp/KAYIIHVJ+x7f+wXtVGzbbq1qTEezWf5Ihg=; b=up950oFKpZ/TkxyGrjxv0WIB9vpSqGDH74n7woL6wTsKY2jFefUnC8kqBeLBQgsW/gJsq08bHatB36d8DD4KITb2UWV2Grf04Jzael/XGPgYsDADsuv2h0FJ1wCo1AEO;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:53079 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1VbE1Q-0005qZ-VC; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:28:09 -0600
Message-ID: <526FFE31.40601@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:28:01 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te@tools.ietf.org>
References: <524AF9A9.3040006@labn.net> <5266E138.8080605@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <5266E138.8080605@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:28:35 -0000

Authors,
	I have some comments on this document. Many are strictly
editorial. Note that I'm the document shepherd, see RFC 4858 for more
information.

- Please address my general comments on the WSON document set

- You define a new top-level TLV, the Generic Node Attribute TLV.  Did
you consider using the Node Attribute TLV defined in RFC5786? Why not
use it?

- The Generic Node Attribute TLV is underspecified as is.
  - What is the sub-tlv format
  - how are unknown TLVs handled
  - are there ordering or other processing constraints
  - etc.

- Section 2.1 and 3.1:
  no need to defined the type twice, drop "(the type is TBD by IANA)"

  the TLV isn't defined in GEN-ENCODE, the format of the value field is.
  in both sections:
  s/meaning and format of this sub-TLV/meaning and format of the sub-TLV
value field

- Section 4
  OLD
   The flooding of Opaque LSAs must follow the rules
   specified in [RFC2328], [RFC5250], [RFC3630], [RFC4203].
NEW
   The flooding rules of Opaque LSAs are
   specified in [RFC2328], [RFC5250], [RFC3630], [RFC4203].

- Section 4, last paragraph
  Text should be aligned with the preexisting TE procedures as defined
  in Section 3 of RFC3630.

- Section 7
  Looks like Acee already covered this section.

- References. [RFC6205] is listed but not used.

That's it on this one,
Lou

On 10/22/2013 4:34 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> 
> All,
> 	Given the recent draft submission deadline and only one comment being
> received to date, we'd like to extend the WG more time for review.
> 
> These drafts represent significant work by the authors and WG, so please
> review and let the WG know what you think (positive or negative)!
> 
> Please have all comments in by October 29.
> 
> Thank you,
> Lou (and Deborah)
> 
> On 10/1/2013 12:34 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> This mail begins working group last call on the WSON documents.  As
>> there are 6 documents in this set, the last call will be three weeks.
>> The documents included in the last call are:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-18
>> (Informational, IPR Disclosed)
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-11
>> (Standards Track, IPR Disclosed)
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-21
>> (Standards Track)
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-05
>> (Standards Track, IPR Disclosed)
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-12
>> (Standards Track, IPR Disclosed)
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-06 (Standards
>> Track) Also has one open issue that will need to be resolved as part of
>> LC, see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/trac/ticket/52.
>>
>> This working group last call ends on October 22.  Comments should be
>> sent to the CCAMP mailing list.  Please remember to include the
>> technical basis for any comments.
>>
>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
>> ready for publication", are welcome!
>>
>> Please note that we're still missing some IPR statements.  Any
>> forthcoming publication request will be delayed by late IPR
>> statements/disclosures.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Lou (and Deborah)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>