Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: (with COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CED1201EB; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 05:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=CH9vtAQs; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=gPUGr6jA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qa52kjvc-9fN; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 05:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC910120045; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 05:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2726; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1554725240; x=1555934840; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2D4G/DNJGA/1SOXCPg3Jg6uhT5WlRvD9J8MkpdBKFo8=; b=CH9vtAQsnquR4TWoQA1+3ivaUwZM19Cr96mfw9GvBMsku6GeUzxkjFzb Hx0qaCC71krfstebpWDNpHPUPGmXhiyjSIPV5b3xSkY7ULk7j+24OkU2p PbB0SyVBFOJiA4KbdzlskOwvR4Q+jIowHKwtQJVdq513pQdR1l4bBzlmx o=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ABlKDshYn5aKQRM1VmsUMB03/LSx94ef9IxIV55?= =?us-ascii?q?w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20gebRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn?= =?us-ascii?q?1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavncT08F8dPfFRk5Hq8d0NSHZW2ag=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ATAAAWOKtc/5FdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUgQBAQEBCwGBPVADaFQgBAsnhA6DRwOPJoIyJZcYgS4UgRA?= =?us-ascii?q?DVA4BASMJhEACF4VOIjUIDQEBAwEBCQEDAm0cDIVKAQEBAQIBIxEMAQE3AQ8?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQgOCgICJgICAjAVBQsCBAENBYMiAYFdAw0IAQIMoiICihRxgS+CeQEBBYF?= =?us-ascii?q?FQYJyGIIMAwWBCyUBi0YXgUA/gREnDBOCTD6CYQIBAgGBKgESATaCczGCJop?= =?us-ascii?q?gggosjA6MZQkCiAGIQINAGoIFhhaDY4hegnqIWYYijVwCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVE?= =?us-ascii?q?CNGVYEQhwFWUBgkGCCgwXFIM4hRSFP3IBgSeNBoI/AQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,325,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="326321415"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Apr 2019 12:07:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x38C7JRn029850 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:07:19 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:07:18 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:07:17 -0400
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:07:17 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2D4G/DNJGA/1SOXCPg3Jg6uhT5WlRvD9J8MkpdBKFo8=; b=gPUGr6jARbEcjaE/EprLZQSBMBzWPwyJbM9vkVv8PBUwKLAZD+lubkgj0uLoTnQEtr+mwTCo0y3kh3ke/jj2h+p8K9rZhdmksIA8NfTBrH4P1q3z849MFZ9ZEylDoROsjLRpWen396eQTbTvtxR8T8dw6ehd9zV6UHEQz6X3fDg=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.210) by MN2PR11MB3838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.21; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:07:16 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9158:74ee:b94a:d51f]) by MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9158:74ee:b94a:d51f%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.011; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:07:16 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "noreply@ietf.org" <noreply@ietf.org>
CC: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module@ietf.org>, "daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tlJ3MgTm8gT2JqZWN0aW9uIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY2Nh?= =?utf-8?Q?mp-alarm-module-08:_(with_COMMENT)?=
Thread-Index: AQHU7gHdDnE6j/ZTvkqLE3J8NYqmCqYyTLiA
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:07:15 +0000
Message-ID: <12AEB78F-C3D9-4052-BD32-1F6962A63FFE@cisco.com>
References: <155458648675.21847.15882795962444550355.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20190408.135441.1084919238498793699.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190408.135441.1084919238498793699.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.1.190326
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:811c:18de:c3f7:41f0]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 89825e71-888f-4e2a-0dc6-08d6bc1abddd
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3838;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3838:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3838B6174194B265EB6974E8A92C0@MN2PR11MB3838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0001227049
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(189003)(199004)(82746002)(99286004)(105586002)(102836004)(2501003)(53936002)(68736007)(186003)(6506007)(14454004)(36756003)(966005)(316002)(46003)(476003)(446003)(81156014)(11346002)(2616005)(6246003)(71200400001)(478600001)(76176011)(8936002)(4326008)(25786009)(6512007)(83716004)(6306002)(81166006)(58126008)(486006)(110136005)(54906003)(71190400001)(2906002)(305945005)(256004)(6116002)(6436002)(97736004)(106356001)(86362001)(224303003)(33656002)(5660300002)(7736002)(6486002)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3838; H:MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Nudk9GOcqPf7pDomOzfwrdPjSHF6VP1KpOCi6TKR3QTDSjkUHRZ5/oQ3N2YSBdv6k4Mgxal45Iilab/JgR5rXpRKuvGzxQG/SfMFdVmMyLM3zaG05sB9ZkTuUbKg/T6En6ba0kJZ5ZapbRwTfZ7UDXxOCfDTubjzqOcfX3Yyye7Md8ACoTygiGuyzRcnQe+UeNrbaHaL856s8prdkeUOKf1XKI2cbQ1ebrcunTq2ElBfSjwWqtQPDbnqkQFFj1kncTGAcT8LQlRRGgOYzNRh/yQrA7XAXdUmHV+dBdCBcCgOs2rMdEA42E3fDx78/4qKxfcfHDb/JOJHNq0wOvAQcvHf4VM7KperKoEnEPePmbEOmAfPIL7nAc8/uqMDwTvP8avHQV8MxNTRvUHPBdzqN8ZMDReD7Y8LIW4IqGlJsG4=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <49B0D20F80423C45A70131BBF39A61DC@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 89825e71-888f-4e2a-0dc6-08d6bc1abddd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Apr 2019 12:07:15.8775 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3838
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.27, xch-aln-017.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6OZ3FB1YgTDndOqkCsMn0vTAja4>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-ccamp-alarm-module-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:07:23 -0000

Martin and Stefan,

Thank you for your answer.

If a new rev is required, then may I suggest to clarify the text around the first 2 points that I raised?

-éric

On 08/04/2019, 13:54, "Martin Bjorklund" <mbj@tail-f.com>; wrote:

    Hi,
    
    Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:
    > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
    > draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: No Objection
    > 
    > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    > introductory paragraph, however.)
    > 
    > 
    > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    > 
    > 
    > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > COMMENT:
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > 
    > Easy to read and well-thought except for "shelving" alarms, it took me a while
    > to understand that it was like "stashing" ;-)
    
    This term was discussed by the WG, but since it is commonly used in
    the alarm industry, we kept it.
    
    > Section 3.4, may I assume that the document fixes the problem "X.733 and
    > especially 3GPP were not really clear on this point." ?
    
    Yes.
    
    > Perhaps did I miss the part where the alarm system could also fails: what
    > alarm? status? does it generate? Or is it out of scope?
    
    This document doesn't define any specific alarm types, so in that
    sense this is out of scope.
    
    > *minor NITS*
    > Section 1 s/north-bound/northbound/ ?
    
    Fixed!
    
    
    
    /martin & stefan