IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers

Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Wed, 05 February 2014 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5591A00C0 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 01:57:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_FORM=2.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2V9azNpmHFd for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 01:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from torres.puc.rediris.es (torres.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95821A00BE for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 01:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by torres.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>) id 1WAzE6-0000fF-LV; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:57:02 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (idanet5.ida.ing.tu-bs.de [134.169.115.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F3811FE2A; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:56:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es
Message-ID: <52F20AEC.1090501@cttc.es>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:57:00 +0100
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.ukadrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <CF1503FC.945B1%zali@cisco.com> <52EF9A9B.6040002@cttc.es> <52EFA6EA.1060903@gmail.com> <058901cf219a$df6e6d30$9e4b4790$@olddog.co.uk> <05F122F0-48E6-4DBA-9BC8-9A320D86A49B@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <05F122F0-48E6-4DBA-9BC8-9A320D86A49B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:57:09 -0000

El 05/02/2014 10:37, Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti) escribió:
> btw sorry for being pedantic, G.697 Appendix V.1 state a 32 bits wavelength ID. So are we already buying a larger dress?

For what concerns me, I just see this appendix as a place in which an 
explicit encoding for "m" (the value of slot width) is given, hopefully 
giving some idea of the range of values that are "acceptable". I did not 
draw any other analogy between that appendix and label format (be in 
WSON or SSON)

R.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email