Re: [CCAMP] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-12: (with COMMENT)

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982F91A0155; Wed, 27 May 2015 14:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qof7mfbQduUj; Wed, 27 May 2015 14:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121AD1A0021; Wed, 27 May 2015 14:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWO93421; Wed, 27 May 2015 21:13:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.130) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:13:42 +0100
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.225]) by dfweml703-chm ([10.193.5.130]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 27 May 2015 14:13:38 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQmLOAQ5c0TreuM0eTSV9Y+M1ZmZ2QTcPQ
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 21:13:37 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729CCE6A0@dfweml706-chm>
References: <20150527192941.20358.5048.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150527192941.20358.5048.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.213]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/6xSXw1RySthCXdTfWXgx2dA9vLs>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 21:13:50 -0000

Hi Alia,

Thanks for providing your comment. I think it has been typical in GMPLS to give a sub-TLV a unit of 32-bit field. Unfortunately, with this, we had to give away another 2 bytes of padding. 

Thanks,
Young

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alia Atlas [mailto:akatlas@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:30 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-12: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm a bit startled that the WavelengthSelection sub-TLV has a used value
of 8 bits (really 1 bit plus a handful of the 127 values) but has a
length of 4 which thus forces 2 octets of padding.   I expect that there
are implementations and this isn't a flaw - just wasteful.