Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 11:41 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2561D12015A for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzM9oT-va8e4 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20113.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B2E1200ED for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=FK9nFn1yqJ8vQGNakk2oXnmqEIcAW7Tqbk0O5o6s2c8=; b=JKEaCOCyBIE/qcw6ChSxfI0WhQtVtxy4OnCLxukM4j6r4F3ViwrrkMbtcdDU3uynFXuwbZxV5E1lyA0F8AgWKOD79Nk5x4fTzf3efShs5DcJJlRmaDNnkDd2QmqOByDrZ3TY2hgPSfx3v7k4lXugsUnh0ZopYLBTMl52EUqd62c=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.46.212) by DB7PR07MB5290.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.44.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.6; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:41:31 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89bf:8194:3f8c:ff65]) by DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89bf:8194:3f8c:ff65%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.007; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:41:31 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
Thread-Index: AQHU6UkERQOX+/KNVE2BJi+xNHWYgg==
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:41:31 +0000
Message-ID: <091501d4e948$a188c800$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <VI1PR07MB50409E6F464C786A9CCAE608F0550@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0446.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:e::26) To DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:7b::20)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.215.234]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9dcde0ed-67f8-4924-eedb-08d6b76026b9
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR07MB5290;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB5290:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB52907ADBE552ABD3458DB921A0560@DB7PR07MB5290.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0995196AA2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(8936002)(25786009)(8676002)(2501003)(81166006)(81156014)(6506007)(71190400001)(71200400001)(386003)(50226002)(2906002)(52116002)(86152003)(5660300002)(6116002)(102836004)(3846002)(26005)(97736004)(61296003)(14454004)(86362001)(186003)(84392002)(6306002)(6486002)(229853002)(446003)(68736007)(966005)(106356001)(9686003)(6512007)(99286004)(476003)(6246003)(256004)(66066001)(14444005)(4720700003)(44716002)(1556002)(53936002)(105586002)(6436002)(62236002)(44736005)(110136005)(81816011)(81686011)(305945005)(7736002)(76176011)(486006)(14496001)(316002)(478600001)(74416001)(7726001)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB5290; H:DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: K1fylPA8HQRErTlKmg+H1gq3VBImGpKtRucCiTLq2FagUIOD+DwOaI3uJyL7GLH6VmuVKclqy6f0GyQfr7n6Zdvf7DM4kY3JNJjaxMj14uqC9dwq0dzg4Ou54YY+LzJ7PQ/yCJnSOI+EXTmVvaDDW8DLGoj1SXI+iVtGtRT2IBSApwSVKa4GnVI2KVqqwBHtmjvImOvY+Q6lINL8mEej4RLwSWesV1fDSAYiSqFCTrcuc2FoppeD8NZgA6KAsfhLeKdUiXorVtrGW0k/WIdPqqlTyb7nm5VZsxrUOhRPwKv98S+aVhpStqsTAaBq659B4dEES4MVZ0P8jpZ9WuAUaKNK7vdgG47s4M+3YSmuWREjcj9NOi3l5XXpnMFl1z6kCIbrvLoKp9TX+xOq+Wf05iOl0gna86i4L3mzZ5YH074=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CE0BFF503886264087CF3B11A8F13AEF@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9dcde0ed-67f8-4924-eedb-08d6b76026b9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Apr 2019 11:41:31.6008 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB5290
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/7I2xUgrGEi84tLVRyC464O9slrg>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:41:38 -0000
To quote the I-D As this description is arbitrarily proposed by the authors to cover a lack of information in IETF and ITU-T, a liaison request to ITU-T is needed. Yes, I see that a liaison is needed after which the draft may or may not need substatial revision. Is this I-D the best way to liaise what needs liaising, buried as it is in YANG. And adoption in this state seems premature since it might bake in assumptions that later prove unfortunate and hinder resolution - nothing specific in mind, just a worry. I never see much difference between working on an unadopted I-D and an adopted one so see scope for progress - e.g. Normative References - even if it is not adopted at this moment in time.. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniele Ceccarelli" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> To: <ccamp@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 2:44 PM Working group, This is the first time we manage to have all the IPR declarations from so many authors in so little time…good progresses 😊 Hence we can start a one week poll on making draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01 a CCAMP working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support" and a motivation for your reply, mandatory for the "not support" and nice to have for the "support". The polling will end on Monday April 8th . Thanks, Daniele & Fatai (Please note that we’re running a single week polling instead of the classical 2 weeks as we would like to include the draft, if adopted, in a liaison to ITU-T SG15) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >
- [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optic… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Gert Grammel
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Aihuaguo (Aihua Guo, CRC)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- [CCAMP] 答复: WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Italo Busi
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… tom petch
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… julien.meuric
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… julien.meuric
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… tom petch
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Yemin (Amy)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Griseri, Enrico (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Ricard Vilalta
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Leeyoung
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Oscar González de Dios
- Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-o… Daniele Ceccarelli