Re: [CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 12:01 UTC

From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU7/WVyJsBMaCswEG68eSrcy+Sd6Y22lJy
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:01:48 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FCFBDC13D@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <155493910930.22716.11857866602240872600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155493910930.22716.11857866602240872600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/7kyd0pz0eY7ZD8KTNFpKeXNYIX4>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hi Suresh,

Thanks for the comments, please see reply inline.

BR,
Amy
________________________________________
发件人: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker [noreply@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2019年4月11日 7:31
收件人: The IESG
抄送: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org; Daniele Ceccarelli; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; ccamp@ietf.org
主题: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Ben's DISCUSS as well.

* In addition, I could not find any reference to the Extended Class-Type Error
and the error value Class-Type mismatch even in the IANA registry at

https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters/rsvp-parameters.xhtml

Is this something you are defining in this document? If so, an entry in the
IANA consideration section is warranted.
[Amy] The idea was to use error code aready defined.
"error code "Extended Class-Type Error" and the error value "Class-Type mismatch" (see [RFC2205])", the text is referenced from RFC6003.
You're right that the error type and error code are not assigned by IANA.
The plan is to use "Unknown Attributes TLV" from RFC 5420 instead.

* Section 7

The table seems to be off. Shouldn't this be?

400 99.99%

200 99.995%

100 99.999%

[Amy] The table will be updated accordingly.

[CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-i… Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
Re: [CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on dra… Yemin (Amy)