[CCAMP] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 10 July 2022 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136B5C15791D; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q5Te41SZKgaH; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F1EAC14CF1B; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 26AArx0g008179; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:53:59 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7224604B; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:53:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B019A4603D; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:53:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:53:59 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([85.255.234.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 26AArwSW028807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:53:59 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:53:58 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <015901d8944b$5c578fd0$1506af70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdiUS00PhL1A+YORTBW4hvRBntcGXA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 85.255.234.144
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27006.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.160-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.160-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27006.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.159800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: gn3Lr6Weh20T6c4IOvIj9rp2HEZ4IFgaHA5wH3/21xHLN5nQQXYmEngZ OO5pM6shqhFfSSgWfh1CC1oxV8Nz29IsKWdppSHsjrVn4cme+w52ZYwNBqM6Imquw69QUQrLXcb xuVyOjZipJRnlB+9UPdwU8VHXGipCTX7PJ/OU3vL+xOhjarOnHlOrNp5VU581+gtHj7OwNO2Ohz Oa6g8KrWiiLymdMU+6aKTmgcxysTtGSHtTMLA8CoNI7FYeefMNvI6Jq/oaLgc=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/7lCDuCwviw-S9lupVY1ZcgqcJew>
Subject: [CCAMP] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 10:54:12 -0000

Hi and welcome onboard.

This is draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang en route for publication as an
RFC. My name is Adrian and I will be your document shepherd for this
journey. Please take your seats and fasten your seatbelts.

Thank you for having kept your draft clean for I-D nits and YANG 
validation.

Below you'll see a few very minor nits and an insignificant question. If
you could address them with a new revision or answers, I can move
ahead with the shepherd write-up.

Thanks,
Adrian

===

I think the first line of Figure 1 should read...

         | l0-types    | ietf-layer0-types       | [RFC9093]       |

---

5.1

s/ietf- te-topology/ietf-te-topology/
s/an flexi-Grid/a flexi-Grid/
s/flexi-Grid/flexi-grid/  (three times)

---

5.2

s/flexi-Grid/flexi-grid/  (twice)

---


5.4

s/flexi-Grid/flexi-grid/ 

---

I wondered whether it would be helpful to point at RFC 8363, but if you
don't think so, that is fine.