Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <> Sat, 26 July 2014 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471951A02E5 for <>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.902
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsEBW-FSuILs for <>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F1A1B280B for <>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=2602; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406386795; x=1407596395; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=qsdepX/gGSDiSQCUtvqZYa+WX9JJHnyw4Tmjrw9ob3k=; b=XuOjd17TTL2BR/Lm+3x5oeBNGD9ZXnlkhq7ZYeu4stkOI/BIyn9NWKCq 3xEqGsOHQ7OInz4tpXs3mGd2yLQ6LuCIJBiPm48OF/eCNBJP/GXJbsO3C XV7lo55H2BEdBuh8gyiMNaRiEajK9bGG14vJK1lBsJ7oQagblF6NLsDYv g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,735,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="64258581"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2014 14:59:53 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6QExr4t023174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:53 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:59:52 -0500
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <>
To: Lou Berger <>, CCAMP <>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg
Thread-Index: AQHPqBt/Uetlrac2z0WF/9LgoLXU+JuyhugA
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:52 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:00:00 -0000

Hi Lou, Deborah, Adrian and the WG:

The following two documents listed in the email has been updated based on
the comments received from Chairs, ADs and the WG. Pointer to the latest
version of the drafts are provided.

     17 - draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry   ===>
    18 - draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3  ===>

These are very slim documents to get code points for ODU1e, ODU3e1, and
ODU3e2. We believe there is support from the WG in this work to start
adoption poll. 

Any comments and a follow-up adoption poll will be greatly appreciated.


Regards Š Zafar

-----Original Message-----
From: "" <>
Date: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:17 AM
To: "" <>
Subject: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area  reorg

>    As described in yesterday's routing area meeting, see
>, our
>ADs have initiated some changes that will impact CCAMP.  As presented,
>technology specific work will remain in ccamp. The other details of
>these changes will be flushed out as part of the forthcoming charter
>drafting / revising.
>As our AD's have stated, it is important that these changes do not stop
>us from making progress.  In this week's meetings we discussed actions
>related to  a number of individual drafts that we don't expect to be
>impacted by the changes.  In particular, we discussed planned updates,
>and subsequent adoption polls, of the following drafts:
>>     11 - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info
>>     12 - draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp
>>     13 - draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib
>>     17 - draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry
>>     18 - draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3
>Please do your updates as discussed and we should be able to poll these
>documents, as planned.  (Hopefully in time to allow for the discussed
>liaison to ITU-T.)
>Importantly, work on WG drafts should also continue as discussed/planned.
>We hope that this addresses the questions we received offline. If you
>still have questions, please feel free to send them to the list -- or
>privately if you prefer.
>Deborah and Lou
>CCAMP mailing list