Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Sat, 26 July 2014 15:00 UTC

From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg
Thread-Index: AQHPqBt/Uetlrac2z0WF/9LgoLXU+JuyhugA
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:59:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CFF939EF.C1566%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D274EF.6040704@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <4E127ABC3F79404D9F80E454AD949D0F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8C33jIvag1nK3jD9l6s24oG4Mt0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg
Precedence: list

Hi Lou, Deborah, Adrian and the WG:

The following two documents listed in the email has been updated based on
the comments received from Chairs, ADs and the WG. Pointer to the latest
version of the drafts are provided.

     17 - draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry   ===>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregi
stry-01.txt
    18 - draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3  ===>
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03.t
xt 


These are very slim documents to get code points for ODU1e, ODU3e1, and
ODU3e2. We believe there is support from the WG in this work to start
adoption poll. 

Any comments and a follow-up adoption poll will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Regards Š Zafar


-----Original Message-----
From: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:17 AM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area  reorg

>
>All,
>    As described in yesterday's routing area meeting, see
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-rtgarea-3.ppt, our
>ADs have initiated some changes that will impact CCAMP.  As presented,
>technology specific work will remain in ccamp. The other details of
>these changes will be flushed out as part of the forthcoming charter
>drafting / revising.
>
>As our AD's have stated, it is important that these changes do not stop
>us from making progress.  In this week's meetings we discussed actions
>related to  a number of individual drafts that we don't expect to be
>impacted by the changes.  In particular, we discussed planned updates,
>and subsequent adoption polls, of the following drafts:
>
>>     11 - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-info
>>     12 - draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp
>>     13 - draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib
>>     17 - draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry
>>     18 - draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3
>
>Please do your updates as discussed and we should be able to poll these
>documents, as planned.  (Hopefully in time to allow for the discussed
>liaison to ITU-T.)
>
>Importantly, work on WG drafts should also continue as discussed/planned.
>
>We hope that this addresses the questions we received offline. If you
>still have questions, please feel free to send them to the list -- or
>privately if you prefer.
>
>Deborah and Lou
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CCAMP mailing list
>CCAMP@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

[CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg Lou Berger
Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg Zafar Ali (zali)
Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg Lou Berger
Re: [CCAMP] Follow up to routing area reorg Zafar Ali (zali)
[CCAMP] Request for comments and adoption for dra… Zafar Ali (zali)