Re: [CCAMP] WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 22 January 2020 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69782120074; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:16:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Ayxby07N; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=eRFSqcub
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CtTaPyIKg2gQ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596E112008D; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:16:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=24722; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1579691796; x=1580901396; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=CE87n5LHnzEsO+jMl2S801SzL+Zgcs6WeDXMGS6hCWs=; b=Ayxby07NHkq/Sz4G7cLYMi7pPQg0dDDVFowf0vCEth8L/5mx9C1zvPfw 0n7iEotMthz1Xrc5ikxCDjCB8iMPTNqfkMO/v783/YMkX4vPRpNRJsQJQ C5Wh5G0M9Bx86lmZIAbpmBShN1N3OfvP09hbEIQrslDzLWzsvzxFliM8Q o=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AiMLdohClnfJBFVLeiLjvUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qs13kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHw?= =?us-ascii?q?QAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuNuHrazA9GuxJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BdAQCBLihe/4oNJK1lHAEBAQEBBwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BEQEEBAEBgWoEAQELAYEkLyQFJwVsWCAECyoKhAiDRgOLBYJfmA6CUgNUCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQwBAS0CAQGEQAIXggIkNwYOAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFXgEBAQEDEhE?= =?us-ascii?q?KEwEBLAYFAQ8CAQYCEQQBASgDAgICMBQJCAEBBAENBQgagwWBfU0DLgECkjm?= =?us-ascii?q?QZQKBOYhhdYEygn8BAQWFAhiCDAmBOAGMFRqBQT+BEUeCTD6CZASBYzSCWjK?= =?us-ascii?q?CLJBVhVyJc48yCoI5lk6CR4gKkCaOXpsIAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFoI4FYcBU7gmx?= =?us-ascii?q?QGA2IAYEnAQKCSYpTdAIBgSaLOAGBDwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,349,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="418166327"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 Jan 2020 11:16:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00MBGYST012213 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:16:34 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 05:16:34 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:16:28 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 05:16:28 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EE2xmlQCRkbOoILzbtdHjjedKfPbHhxXpDUQl/we70CMCaKmxtoPkOqNXaQa7cessqdliXJnk3I+3V/JMt310mLh4ybG5lhLdlTdG3a/7YmEiZlxYoNHkuWRh5cLkgXxH7SbOhzM1QvlaBW8MwQxv8RuKAAhgsrI20RSX2Qe2HSYQYLo2SYOiGyi94zk02fS9bj2fbZzAlUPC8yQIbUaOxqkjhbYxmv7nuuv1uqleLoR96/b3H+7XWpKF3drfvJMLNVRN33Zz3R38pmodRuHRjTLxy61p35WR5262o1hXNROC9qYH+A3V2EhM0zeL0zNsmvcNs1mS1EAvyf/uHIqww==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CE87n5LHnzEsO+jMl2S801SzL+Zgcs6WeDXMGS6hCWs=; b=ZjFr6U5S9LV0/sp0cv1yWUtQjjV93a4rCoEqgyy+WTSkIl0c1HQFUEajhTHw7kDE6WKwxm7ykXcX0lQ4A+1Ghi0LUk9lCm3zdRsY/CzpIZjEj7mkvJUT77d1K4do9OAOTw8ueBE+Sn88zcRno2MmBuChPxnoKRYVdlvYn3KUdzSx1ykaqC32PMGOFWLhsZEiS5CrFVOUd5ubp4gUU0BWhTj4xO+y6Vq2ITsM2dQUnY47WIVawq4hlOMWjoydKJoqh67GYXsP0glG6PAmtxV4QA5P1qaPRhQ5DnjYlnDH9ReRsNI0VcA+d35UYBjs15GvREAmerTzPNlcNyrZyaBsgw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CE87n5LHnzEsO+jMl2S801SzL+Zgcs6WeDXMGS6hCWs=; b=eRFSqcubah+uTz0nvGbYMv+9dgvEirc/W1xlw+XyHLBfRJSkNoONaHs4Yll6TcxlBPSrUbonXFr3V20qD1Baji7ueTxb7HOBrTDcCdJ/7YJmEE0zvjXUK4FbfL0xuw9NRxJl80fSyISpFCV9VPMFBs3fWEOi+guJAqLlVfXDvAQ=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.209) by MN2PR11MB3645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.254.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.24; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:16:27 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b9ce:1058:5fa6:44a1]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b9ce:1058:5fa6:44a1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.027; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:16:27 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03
Thread-Index: AdXLa0emjtU/227sSi6n2tkcRa5K7wFo4b0gAADf7hAAAL0k0A==
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:16:27 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4366AFE164F3DDE2603C5BD0B50C0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A43B9564FC@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com> <MN2PR11MB4366B63A7F81474987F2D73FB50C0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <AM6PR0702MB3606038D518B44BB69D731FFF00C0@AM6PR0702MB3606.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR0702MB3606038D518B44BB69D731FFF00C0@AM6PR0702MB3606.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.39]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9e11a058-cd59-47aa-6363-08d79f2c862e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3645:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3645E19107C0CF7C797F38BDB50C0@MN2PR11MB3645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 029097202E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(81166006)(81156014)(5660300002)(52536014)(8676002)(478600001)(33656002)(66476007)(76116006)(66446008)(66946007)(64756008)(66556008)(9686003)(26005)(9326002)(8936002)(86362001)(186003)(316002)(2906002)(6506007)(53546011)(110136005)(71200400001)(4326008)(7696005)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3645; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 6XN519tw/exm1KN5DbQCHc2N6txqu81krvtA8PiRkrwFLJJvtVPdkkOHYOrRgO59Nr+PR7kJI8oxUWANkVMVfY6pNZGHq/o9+XhvW8Y3TpezQZuq2ROXB1IDV1fi4jB+a3BDZr1ViCjgXS6eHp5S/2dzo79OfBJjWBfickPwUK2GXvNkZ+RMzhbqY/2uuMxrSARys4uBU97OpAiX9dkdxq6lp+49nYq6cA9AP4vCo7mmArl02abf4RXRIxYbfRNx2hH7+QRRwD3l6tzjJeHlZ/DgBq6liiX5kBFPSkml3N/+wHIoLe8jJkqrIVFGW3/DMMwPHRvT1QYG/YtXPoDZ3uoAWFzH0W1KU25TIq7Y7wrTnF+rFtXYWnD7Z9j1X3m6sGsydfVpZ8YOPlBCZCFHZu/lKwZ/nv2ilDC/RcsmhRLUhHSND1Pvi4DBIAZsa3Yo
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB4366AFE164F3DDE2603C5BD0B50C0MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9e11a058-cd59-47aa-6363-08d79f2c862e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jan 2020 11:16:27.2840 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: GopME3IsNyAcMrwul6VdO+wQVGDtdBdy334ZWVxjVnH1SDorxJigl+a83oCzpVA9g69h49aVaGp7FIS0RDHtBA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3645
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xch-aln-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8GmZ3dCrHB4t31qTUAFRks9aGYc>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:16:38 -0000

Hi Daniele,

That sounds good.

Thanks,
Rob


From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
Sent: 22 January 2020 10:59
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>om>; Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>om>; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03

Hi Rob,

Thanks a lot for the input.
Actually the plan was to start working immediately on the optical YANG models (that make use of the L0 types).

I would suggest to complete all the work on the L0/L1 types so that the only thing left to be done is “pressing the button” and in the meanwhile we can start the last call on the models that use them.

Thanks,
Daniele

From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com<mailto:rwilton@cisco.com>>
Sent: den 22 januari 2020 11:37
To: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com<mailto:zhenghaomian@huawei.com>>; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>) <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03

Hi Haomian and CCAMP chairs,

I can’t remember if I’ve mentioned this before, you might want to hold sending the layer0 and layer1 types drafts to the IESG until you have got a bit further with the YANG models that make use of the types definitions in these drafts.  I.e. I’m suggesting that you get to the stage where they have logically completed WG LC, then focus on the YANG modules that make use of these types, and once those modules look mature, then push the types drafts to the IESG, shortly followed by the modules that make use of them.  This would mean that if any tweaks to the type modules are required they should be easy to fix in the WG (with another short WGLC if required) rather than trying to fix them later in the process, or being stuck with structures that are not quite right.

Thanks,
Rob


From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian
Sent: 15 January 2020 06:16
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>) <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03

Hi WG, Chairs,

This work is the base for layer0 network modeling.

Now almost all the YANG doctor/WG issues are solved in WG github, and we believe the document ready to go after all addressed.

Best wishes,
Haomian (as co-author)

发件人: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Daniele Ceccarelli
发送时间: 2020年1月13日 21:47
收件人: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>) <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
主题: [CCAMP] WG last call draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03

CCAMP,

the IPR declaration collection has been successfully completed (and sorry once again for the issues with the list) and we can move to the next step.

This starts a 2 weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-03
The last call ends on Monday January 27th. Please send you comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected and can be found in the history of the document.
If interested, please volunteer to be the shepherd of the draft (authors excluded).




Thanks

Daniele & Fatai