Re: [CCAMP] draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-03.txt

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 09 August 2013 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE6A11E81B0 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.566, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXcVLNctWlno for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50C21F9D3B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1251; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1376069941; x=1377279541; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8+wbOpwfitj1CE3JKB/ld0Fc8rabir1bWwB1R0lsoT4=; b=b96kMst28LOMtXiHzRtPIHT9YR/R6qvenwZC2EeLShVySh03I8Laqz+Q fQdMVR5I9E1Kvxj31SAnXFwrfy7C8flGd6+V5FmsiqjW2FNTVi8PgaCyl gipYBcyIqw4DoMoSGh147/wu5NBGjHDPJ7C/9e4eQwgufUVSmUb+XbydE 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAN8nBVKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABbgwaBBb5RgRoWdIIkAQEBBDpLBgEIEQMBAgsUQh0IAQEEARIIiAi5LJABOAaDFHUDqTGDG4Iq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,847,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="245644847"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2013 17:39:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r79Hd0YP026937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:39:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.213]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:38:59 -0500
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-03.txt
Thread-Index: Ac6UXh3OMYPEaNUmSzSE7m3SYlvx7wARnPhAACDxnIAACRnMAP//xeaA
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:38:59 +0000
Message-ID: <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D30EA01F35@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5016733261cf49a9a2d888b67e7a8f17@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.82.252.237]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <688826012E3ABD4D87D44A04D06148D3@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:45:47 -0000

-----Original Message-----

From: "jdrake@juniper.net" <jdrake@juniper.net>
Date: Friday, August 9, 2013 1:06 PM
To: zali <zali@cisco.com>, Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>,
"ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [CCAMP]
draft-ali-ccamp-rc-objective-function-metric-bound-03.txt

>>Hi John/ Fatai-
>>ERO expansion is an already supported functionality since early days of
>>RSVP-
>>TE and is widely deployed.  There is a new requirement to convey latency
>>bound in TE networks. Hence a very simple and logical extension in RSVP
>>TE
>>to support the newly defined TE (latency) metrics.
>
>JD:  From the draft:  " In these scenarios, there is a need for the
>ingress node to
>       convey the optimization criteria including the TE metrics (e.g.,
>IGP metric, TE
>       metric, hop counts, latency, etc.) to be used for the path
>computation to the
>      node performing route computation or expansion."

John:

Some text was loose w.r.t. what is defined in the draft. So the real
comment is on this sentence. Nonetheless, we can explicitly confine the
scope of the draft to newly defined TE metrics (most important use case is
latency; latency variation for completeness).

Thanks

Regards...Zafar