Re: [CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3

Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Tue, 15 January 2013 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607D811E809B for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:43:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id on8N58YT-P5C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1812011E8099 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:43:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOT81750; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:43:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:43:06 +0000
Received: from SZXEML419-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.158) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:43:12 +0000
Received: from SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.16]) by szxeml419-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.158]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:43:03 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "Gruman, Fred" <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3
Thread-Index: Ac3s82+y8vO2F259QmKlwmEkZgQsmgAnFmNAAU6H/qA=
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:43:03 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF835855C67@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <5DF87403A81B0C43AF3EB1626511B2923C3031BF@RCHEXMBP2.fnc.net.local> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4805CD90@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4805CD90@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF835855C67SZXEML552MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:43:16 -0000

Hi Fred and Daniele,

Yes, I will update to make them consistent.



Best Regards

Fatai

From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 7:06 PM
To: Gruman, Fred; ccamp@ietf.org
Cc: Fatai Zhang
Subject: RE: Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3

Hi Fred,

during the last call it was suggested to change the switching capability from 101 to 110. The comment was raised just against OSPF, but i think it was just an oversight.

If Fatai and the other co-authors agree i would suggest aligning also RSVP to 110 (either explicitely or with a reference to OSPF)

Many thanks
Daniele



________________________________
From: Gruman, Fred [mailto:fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com]
Sent: lunedì 7 gennaio 2013 17.24
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Cc: Fatai Zhang; Daniele Ceccarelli
Subject: Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3
Hi Fatai, Daniele,

I noticed that in the latest routing draft of ospf-g709v3-04 that the switching capability was changed from 101 to 110.  The latest signaling draft signaling-g709v3-05 still lists 101 as the switching type (in section 4) although it does defer to [OTN-OSPF].  I assume that the switching capability/type is to be consistent between routing and signaling and that the new recommendation is 110.  Is this correct?

If so, I would recommend removing the "(101, TBA by IANA)" from the signaling draft and rely on the reference to [OTN-OSPF].

Thanks,
Fred