[CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-exchange-01.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 20 November 2014 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54EA1A1A10 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zvXfk04vL8Y0 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17691A1A76 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:41:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAKFfEfj011620 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:41:14 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAKFfDH0011603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:41:14 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ietf.org
References: <20141120153804.21629.48829.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141120153804.21629.48829.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:41:12 -0000
Message-ID: <014f01d004d8$69db4850$3d91d8f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQMXEeOv4uSir0HsujQVhxF8/3fn/ZnbjFmQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21118.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.410-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.410-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: im+fhl6xvt3QWNwW5w2Yum/CU2X9JBM7bv16+gil4jcn+p552csI1bu8 G1SWU03hqpxag6n0dG83vfzxb624cFgYIP9YyXCkr3X9gdfSLWWFBoWoxESWCTAiPlVVBqli0TD 6UetkoeXECUH9SfDD2yMLP2WWRwqH1xQ2OgXti5WAV3ZMVrKwyBmyTBaqiJvcZ5yuplze9puDtx 8lDD0Wx+BmZBH3ZVRSZfPmKJtMlub+BikoAvJRQeQ0jDxGUAJDI5K4Cd+0ao+M2ehTV+imi2mCt i+JzZB1EgY/Umh7PPyQE/grWNlKfUe2IyfuxlEMjSOVeRIcbV6+F//Mn3a2w/+/NJoRFMzeZ473 Qvy05nrP7W1KyBJxpDb4UExMs2L3ePGAeSn124KA6qv+vR34LH0tCKdnhB581B0Hk1Q1KyIYq/Q JOAA07Y2j49Ftap9Ero1URZJFbJuXh6+Z8urz9Sh1JaASuJqTbv/N8L7z0rKJyEYf1x6tfP0l3z Z/VoMPGIIqBJBFGqrV3quw5YhViJs1fVJbunMPeKPWBAWhYhI2Fo4EfHNqXY5MJKdFN6D6I9UhQ YuUjidG3TVmsFmvfnl6QuMBp4fE
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8nnv_mi55vYA3hC0ZnLV0u5BvvA
Subject: [CCAMP] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-exchange-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:41:20 -0000

As noted in the CCAMP meeting in HI [1] a few minor edits were stored up from before adoption of this document. This revision makes those changes.

You'll find:

Section 4.3
Added a view words about RFC 5623.

Section 8 final para
Small change in wording to soften the meaning and deliver the original intent.

Update for publication of RFC 7399.


Open issues still remaining (per [1])

- Should this I-D be moved to Informational?
- Missing sections
   5.4 Considerations for Dynamic Abstraction
   5.6 Addressing Considerations
   11 manageability Considerations
   12 Security Considerations

Adrian

[1] http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-ccamp-2.pptx slide 19

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: 20 November 2014 15:38
> To: Xian Zhang; Daniele Ceccarelli; George Swallow; George Swallow; Adrian
> Farrel; Nabil Bitar; John Drake; Xian Zhang; Daniele Ceccarelli; Adrian Farrel; John
> Drake; Dr. Nabil N. Bitar
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-
> exchange-01.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-exchange-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-exchange
> Revision:	01
> Title:		Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange
> Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks
> Document date:	2014-11-20
> Group:		ccamp
> Pages:		56
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-
> te-info-exchange-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-
> info-exchange/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-info-
> exchange-01
> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-interconnected-te-
> info-exchange-01
> 
> Abstract:
>    In Traffic Engineered (TE) systems, it is sometimes desirable to
>    establish an end-to-end TE path with a set of constraints (such as
>    bandwidth) across one or more network from a source to a destination.
>    TE information is the data relating to nodes and TE links that is
>    used in the process of selecting a TE path.  The availability of TE
>    information is usually limited to within a network (such as an IGP
>    area) often referred to as a domain.
> 
>    In order to determine the potential to establish a TE path through a
>    series of connected networks, it is necessary to have available a
>    certain amount of TE information about each network.  This need not
>    be the full set of TE information available within each network, but
>    does need to express the potential of providing TE connectivity. This
>    subset of TE information is called TE reachability information.
> 
>    This document sets out the problem statement and architecture for the
>    exchange of TE information between interconnected TE networks in
>    support of end-to-end TE path establishment.  For reasons that are
>    explained in the document, this work is limited to simple TE
>    constraints and information that determine TE reachability.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat