IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC9A1A0CEE for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:46:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySmJ2v4PqLOi for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4470B1A0CD3 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:46:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=936; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393825596; x=1395035196; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4o0ewsXTwzOcZKcH30YzCOs8LY7TjBG8Bji/ep2HyXk=; b=D/ts8mU0MH5AUrX3KCyUuqHWLPlIx5j5YcLfP7FpN32C4pzoJPGvfWz3 gA3xe4kuTCy31acBUyMp4qvqI9f2UBGPEo2pgrDmYwBNVFdKXBlejo9MP bdWFVySAEsbDQNIgC3mX/I31IT7VJto52rcNL4RlozfpR78kVVO6f7rIq A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFAOQVFFOtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagwaBEsBNgRcWdIIlAQEBBHkMBgEIDgMDAQJQER0IAgQOBRSHUQMRxHsNhx0XjEOCFgcGhDIBA5ZPgW2MY4VIgy2CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,576,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="307609885"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2014 05:46:36 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s235kaL5029297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:46:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.212]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:46:35 -0600
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
Thread-Index: AQHPMdsUqW49vINDCkW/awk6nMLomJrGMiKAgAAgTQCAA9lggIAA1cMAgAAHuACAAASDgIAAF+4AgAAtuACAACGRAP//wlkAgABXF4D//7V6gIAAVzaAgANasoA=
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:46:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CF397F5A.9EEAE%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5311015B.1090404@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.247.172]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <88D657624CC3A844B70E3A9BCAF77877@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/9NMVlMoLVgixWefbekfmXy-V0q8
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:46:40 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Friday, February 28, 2014 4:36 PM
To: zali <zali@cisco.com>
Cc: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org"
<ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update

>Zafar,
>	I think you miss-parsed my words.  the instances I witnessed were rare.
>The protocol behaved as designed.
>
>Lou

Hi Lou and all: 

This is consistent with my experience - it works! The onus is on the
writer of this draft to connivence the WG that... Given the existing
"generalized" mechanisms work and are deployed, why we need to add
"technology specific" methods. LSPs in transport networks are long lived
and the setup rate is low; reducing signaling loop for Perr does not cut
it, IMO.  

I am all for writing an Info draft or a BCP doc, if it helps the
community. 

Thanks

Regards Š Zafar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email