Re: [CCAMP] Following up on Vancouver overlay discussion

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Wed, 29 January 2014 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B158D1A03FE for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:33:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDZKekrinCp5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946431A03F8 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail47-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.227) by CH1EHSOBE019.bigfish.com (10.43.70.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:34 +0000
Received: from mail47-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail47-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686428010E; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -21
X-BigFish: VPS-21(zz9371I542I1432Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL8275dh1de097h186068hz2fh109h2a8h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah224fh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h2216h22d0h2336h2461h2487h24d7h2516h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail47-ch1: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=jdrake@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(199002)(189002)(13464003)(51704005)(377454003)(53806001)(74316001)(69226001)(93136001)(90146001)(65816001)(51856001)(83322001)(56776001)(80022001)(59766001)(63696002)(49866001)(74502001)(74876001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(74706001)(15975445006)(54316002)(87936001)(80976001)(94316002)(92566001)(85852003)(66066001)(46102001)(86362001)(31966008)(47446002)(83072002)(81542001)(79102001)(81686001)(74662001)(47736001)(76786001)(2656002)(33646001)(76576001)(93516002)(76796001)(50986001)(81816001)(81342001)(54356001)(56816005)(4396001)(87266001)(77982001)(74366001)(94946001)(76482001)(47976001)(85306002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.239.12; FPR:; InfoNoRecordsA:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail47-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail47-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1391034812770127_10700; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.236]) by mail47-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC03E0051; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CH1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.43.70.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:32 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB564.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.150) by BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.395.1; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:31 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB564.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.859.15; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:30 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.00.0859.020; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:30 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)" <db3546@att.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Following up on Vancouver overlay discussion
Thread-Index: AQHPHSWQ1OXYCpwv2ESiYBqoP3W8LZqcSNZA
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:30 +0000
Message-ID: <8610ac0722564f1d91639383d273e2d7@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <52E951AD.80504@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <52E951AD.80504@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.12]
x-forefront-prvs: 01068D0A20
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Following up on Vancouver overlay discussion
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:33:39 -0000

Deborah and Lou,

The authors of draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange plan to post a new revision before the London IETF deadline. We think this document already contains the material for your documents 1 & 2    and clearly shows that very few protocol extensions will be needed. The document also addresses both multi-technology scenarios as well as peer-network use cases. We believe that there has been a good level of offline discussion and support of this document and would like to hear comments on the mailing list.

In particular, whether it is ready for adoption by the WG.

Yours Irrespectively,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:08 AM
> To: CCAMP; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)
> Subject: [CCAMP] Following up on Vancouver overlay discussion
> 
> All,
> 
> We wanted to follow up on the plan we discussed in Vancouver.
> 
> In Vancouver, we had talked about three types of documents:
>    Document 1 - Models & Terminology
> 	To be based on existing text / drafts
>    Document 2 - Framework
> 	To includes analysis of what can be supported
> 	and what functions need support
> 	(Again, taking from existing text / drafts
> 	where available.)
>    Document type 3 - Solution documents
> 	To be purely contribution driven
> 
> The enlisted editors of the first document (Julien and Oscar) have been making
> progress and we expect that they will publish a draft soon.  This draft will be a
> starting point for discussion and contribution/co-authorship, rather than
> anything near completion.
> 
> It's our hope that the document will be a sufficient foundation for work on
> Document 2 to start.  Keep in mind that all documents will be based on
> contributions brought to / discussed by the WG.  To be clear, and to respond to
> some off-list e-mail, there is no limitation on discussion, drafts or
> presentations at the next meeting on this or any related topic.
> 
> Deborah and Lou
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>