Comments on "draft-li-ccamp-wson-igp-eval-01.txt"

"Bardalai, Snigdho" <Snigdho.Bardalai@us.fujitsu.com> Thu, 31 July 2008 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81603A6889 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y54ITyjP228u for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006033A6861 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KOeiP-0003He-E2 for ccamp-data@psg.com; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:25:37 +0000
Received: from [168.127.0.57] (helo=fncnmp04.fnc.fujitsu.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Snigdho.Bardalai@us.fujitsu.com>) id 1KOeiL-0003HC-Fa for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:25:35 +0000
Received: from rchemx01.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.104]) by fncnmp02.fnc.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2008 15:25:33 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8F34B.B0765B74"
Subject: Comments on "draft-li-ccamp-wson-igp-eval-01.txt"
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:26:18 -0500
Message-ID: <A278CCD6FF152E478C3CF84E4C3BC79D03A20238@rchemx01.fnc.net.local>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Comments on "draft-li-ccamp-wson-igp-eval-01.txt"
Thread-Index: AcjzHjsIdY3AYvIMSpaBU1im8++FVAALWyUQ
From: "Bardalai, Snigdho" <Snigdho.Bardalai@us.fujitsu.com>
To: "Ccamp (E-mail)" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>

> Hi Adrian and Dan,
> 
> I have the following comments on this draft. I was wondering what were the objectives for the IGP evaluation. IMHO the evaluation from WSON perspective should address the following:
> 1. IGP usage in the context of traditional distributed solutions for WSON
> 2. IGP usage in the context of PCE solutions for WSON 
> 3. Flooding and refresh of static and dynamic link state updates
> 4. Data base sync-up during node restarts
> 
> Could you please let me know if the above is within the current scope? I believe that these are important.
> 
> Thanks,
> Snigdho
> 
> 
> 
> 
>