[CCAMP] POLL CLOSED - WG adoption poll on draft-zheng-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-03

[Igor Bryskin <[e-mail]>]

  Hi Fatai,I have to say, I like your style very much too;)
As you personally encouraged me, I have asked a few questions during the poll, sometimes repeating them several times in a very clear and direct way.
So far, all but one of them were completely ignored, just crickets.The one question that was answered, was done so in a very perfunctory and totally illogical way: We couldnt/shouldn't stop slicing at IP layer, because NS framework doesn't limit slicing to IP. True, but neither it demands slicing in lower layers, just envisions that certain resource partitioning will be required to support higher layer slicing.--》For example, my nearest beach rules do not  limit using the beach to summer months, yet I do not jump into icy water in January.
Not to say that NS framework itself is still a work very much in progress.
The most obvious question is why the authors are clinging so desperately to the term "OTN slice"? After all it is just a term ( albeit very shiny these days). Why wouldn't  they just say: OK, you guys, find it a bit confusing. Let's come up with something  else. How about "OTN resource partition" or "OTN virtual network", as, I was told, SG12 folks did some 6 years ago when they themselves killed the term "OTN slice" ( which was being used since 2010) precisely because of the unfortunate connotation of something OTN partitioning service offered to OTN clients was not.
In short, I still like the Daniele's proposal of interim meeting.
Cheers,Igor


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:45 AM, Fatai Zhang<zhangfatai=[e-mail]> wrote:    <!--#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 p.yiv0828751243MsoNormal, #yiv0828751243 li.yiv0828751243MsoNormal, #yiv0828751243 div.yiv0828751243MsoNormal {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph;font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv0828751243 a:link, #yiv0828751243 span.yiv0828751243MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0828751243 a:visited, #yiv0828751243 span.yiv0828751243MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0828751243 p.yiv0828751243MsoPlainText, #yiv0828751243 li.yiv0828751243MsoPlainText, #yiv0828751243 div.yiv0828751243MsoPlainText {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv0828751243 span.yiv0828751243EmailStyle17 {font-family:sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv0828751243 span.yiv0828751243EmailStyle18 {font-family:sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv0828751243 span.yiv0828751243Char {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv0828751243 .yiv0828751243MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv0828751243 filtered {}#yiv0828751243 div.yiv0828751243WordSection1 {}-->
Hi all,
 
  
 
The WG poll is closed with the result of the draft being adopted based on the WG consensus.
 
  
 
We as the chairs made the decision to adopt the draft because there is lots of interest in this topic and the open comments have been clarified to some extent, and we’re arranging an interim just on this draft and the WG will decide if and how to update the draft according to mailing list discussion and interim discussions.
 
  
 
Authors, please republish draft-zheng-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-03  as draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-00 with only the date and file name changed..
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
Thanks,
 
  
 
Fatai & Daniele
 
  
 
  
 
发件人: CCAMP [mailto:[e-mail]]代表 Fatai Zhang
发送时间: 2022年1月12日 10:24
收件人: CCAMP <[e-mail]>
主题: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-zheng-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-03
 
  
 
Hi all,
 
  
 
All the IPR declarations regarding draft-zheng-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-03 have been collected, this starts the polling for WG adoption.
 
  
 
The poll will last 2 weeks and will end on Wednesday January 26th.
 
  
 
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support" and a motivation for your reply, mandatory for the "not support" and nice to have for the "support".
 
  
 
  
 
Thanks,
 
  
 
Fatai & Daniele
 
  
 
  
 
  
 _______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp