Re: [CCAMP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: (with COMMENT)

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C457D1201C1; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t70UplUj0m0x; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C961200D7; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 119021AE02BD; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:01:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:01:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20190408.130134.508071569625156828.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: ietf@kuehlewind.net, noreply@ietf.org
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module@ietf.org, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <155439000849.30886.16408565964646356370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <155439000849.30886.16408565964646356370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/CRiI6LmyhUHWfksfMU1nhRwa6cU>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] =?iso-8859-1?q?Mirja_K=FChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_dra?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:01:37 -0000

Hi,

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Minor editorial comment:
> Appendix F.2.4.:
> "G.7710 is different than the previous referenced alarm standards.  It
>    does define a data-model for alarm reporting. "
> Is this correct or is there a "not" missing?

A "not" is indeed missing, thanks for catching this!



/martin