Re: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09

"Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <> Fri, 09 March 2018 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBB01270FC for <>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:19:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEg0Bl1fHmrO for <>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA201124F57 for <>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 13:19:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=31187; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520630362; x=1521839962; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=W0aofpisIwIId509W7M8vQP9SV+2HyES88XX8f9YpeU=; b=O3t3DxJV6MGuM8SOWwrd3UwUfc8b6tWniT4LM2SK//wnDzBfOapJ1H4l 4vjCdBFp18K92W4/2gFejvFPrAo5MxNw7giyolwCi5w0SzUuWb7lmbYSS RLbsAkXI5UtHmban1TtXArxnOJR1J/4/wVsKV6uehJn608wLPVxB99aGL k=;
X-Files: image001.png : 1632
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,447,1515456000"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="81278517"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2018 21:19:21 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w29LJLfn000655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 21:19:21 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:19:20 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:19:20 -0500
From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <>
To: Leeyoung <>, "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <>, Dieter Beller <>
CC: "CCAMP (" <>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09
Thread-Index: AdO1ckOMdafcMjmT60SDuJfWCarJGgCVmfMAAAFhToAAAL8IgAATWZkA
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 21:19:20 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_C19FC205E6CA46CF9270D083B7A1026Fciscocom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 21:19:25 -0000

Thanks a lot for the clear explanation Young,

I fully agree with You.




Gabriele Galimberti
Principal Engineer
Cisco Photonics Srl

via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C
20871 - Vimercate (MB)
Phone :+39 039 2091462
Mobile :+39 335 7481947
Fax :+39 039 2092049

From: CCAMP <> on behalf of Leeyoung <>
Date: Friday, 9 March 2018 at 21:09
To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <>om>, Dieter Beller <>
Cc: "CCAMP (" <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09

Hi all,

The scope of this document is to enhance OSPF to carry LSA that includes impairment data. How to use these data is up to head end node or external PCE to compute the path that is impairment-aware.
RFC 6566 explains this context well. See Section 5 of RFC 6566 that discusses the computation models. Of course, the computation algorithm as to how to use impairment info is the secret source for each vendor, which is not what we talk about in this draft. We only say these impairment data is needed to enhance the RWA optical path calculation.

Hope this explains.


From: CCAMP [] On Behalf Of Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 3:44 AM
To: Dieter Beller <>
Cc: CCAMP ( <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09

agree on the fact that this comment apply to other drafts, rather than this one, in particular: RFC6566 and draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info


On 9 Mar 2018, at 10:04, Dieter Beller <<>> wrote:

Hi all,

no/do not support

Reasoning: the definition of optical impairment parameters and the encoding of those is useless without the definition of a computational model for
optical impairment validation (IV) in the context of end-to-end path computation in a WDM network.
Computational models are typically vendor-specific and the draft does therefore not provide a solution to the problem of optical impairment validation
(computation of paths where optical impairment constraints need to considered.) The same applies to the related drafts addressing IV.


On 06.03.2018 18:41, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
Working group,

This starts a two weeks poll on making  draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09 a CCAMP working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support" and a motivation for  your reply, mandatory for the "not support" and nice to have for the "support".
Please note that the IPR declarations was carried out against version -08 and this is version -09 but there is no change in the content of the document, just a date refresh. No IPR was disclosed against this document.
The polling will end on Tuesday march 20th.

Daniele & Fatai


CCAMP mailing list<>

CCAMP mailing list<>