Re: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09

"Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <> Fri, 09 March 2018 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D224D12AF83 for <>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:43:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id txfR0ivKXS9s for <>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:43:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409BE126C19 for <>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:43:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=21539; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520588635; x=1521798235; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=v4CdOHLJHpPD8NWBuX2PjulknJ8liFTOaF5sCAFU9P0=; b=iLXmzhcoH3fFuCmNF+SYtPPDVHNrD2lu9k/cRWVeYjwWLySl+vqwJWJe SrHJXjGSeL29eFWyrd88SxVo/hL6TDJDaYkMu5jHbSZhNjRLGxaF86oQr Y5/6NY05MutM6/ILEMvuFMKWR6LJVK9CzOckKGFtWU8scPQ2oNsRb6/RM 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DXAAA0VqJa/4sNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJadmZvKAqNZI13gxiUKhSCAQoYAQqFAgKDDyE0GAECAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAmsnhSQCBAEBZQcLEAIBCDgHBycLFBECBA4FG4QaZA+uX4Rxg3aCFQW?= =?us-ascii?q?FNoIugVaCD4MEgy4BAYE+ARIBVYMDgjIEmlUJApBngWOENIhKkSACERMBgSs?= =?us-ascii?q?BHjhhcXAVOioBghiESHeIRg0YB4EDgRcBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,444,1515456000"; d="scan'208,217";a="368482913"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2018 09:43:54 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w299hsfB022302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:43:54 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:43:53 -0600
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 03:43:53 -0600
From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <>
To: Dieter Beller <>
CC: Daniele Ceccarelli <>, "CCAMP (" <>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09
Thread-Index: AQHTt4WdQoQ5af8DTQ2CUCNPstp7i6PIC80A
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:43:53 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9BB3A10ECA3A431D90FA4EFE2A928AEDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll for adoption - draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 09:43:57 -0000

agree on the fact that this comment apply to other drafts, rather than this one, in particular: RFC6566 and draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info


On 9 Mar 2018, at 10:04, Dieter Beller <<>> wrote:

Hi all,

no/do not support

Reasoning: the definition of optical impairment parameters and the encoding of those is useless without the definition of a computational model for
optical impairment validation (IV) in the context of end-to-end path computation in a WDM network.
Computational models are typically vendor-specific and the draft does therefore not provide a solution to the problem of optical impairment validation
(computation of paths where optical impairment constraints need to considered.) The same applies to the related drafts addressing IV.


On 06.03.2018 18:41, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
Working group,

This starts a two weeks poll on making  draft-martinelli-ccamp-wson-iv-encode-09 a CCAMP working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support" and a motivation for  your reply, mandatory for the "not support" and nice to have for the "support".
Please note that the IPR declarations was carried out against version -08 and this is version -09 but there is no change in the content of the document, just a date refresh. No IPR was disclosed against this document.
The polling will end on Tuesday march 20th.

Daniele & Fatai

CCAMP mailing list<>

CCAMP mailing list<>