[CCAMP] Following up on Vancouver overlay discussion

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 29 January 2014 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AD01A03A2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:08:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-8luZQ5cb2I for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:08:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alt-proxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com [74.220.193.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F050F1A0383 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:08:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 24350 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jan 2014 19:08:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2014 19:08:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=bPmxiyWcPtUICeMwsqnPO+FqWAKmnDzeS2ALLBuZYkA=; b=RIEbp8sxrYgkdRgOdB1VVkr/sEiNl7hyRCGz3VUsMA1tyL4VbmgFtSDQNhwvIdd44DJNpd93P5LeuWGfGWPd0IRgssnnALLgGM6pue+OPslw2qTSIX6cfwPpgkLhzqaf;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:52997 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1W8aUz-0003QZ-Kj; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:08:33 -0700
Message-ID: <52E951AD.80504@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:08:29 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)" <db3546@att.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Subject: [CCAMP] Following up on Vancouver overlay discussion
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:08:42 -0000

All,

We wanted to follow up on the plan we discussed in Vancouver.

In Vancouver, we had talked about three types of documents:
   Document 1 - Models & Terminology
	To be based on existing text / drafts
   Document 2 - Framework
	To includes analysis of what can be supported
	and what functions need support
	(Again, taking from existing text / drafts
	where available.)
   Document type 3 - Solution documents
	To be purely contribution driven

The enlisted editors of the first document (Julien and Oscar) have been
making progress and we expect that they will publish a draft soon.  This
draft will be a starting point for discussion and
contribution/co-authorship, rather than anything near completion.

It's our hope that the document will be a sufficient foundation for work
on Document 2 to start.  Keep in mind that all documents will be based
on contributions brought to / discussed by the WG.  To be clear, and
to respond to some off-list e-mail, there is no limitation on
discussion, drafts or presentations at the next meeting on this or any
related topic.

Deborah and Lou