Re: [CCAMP] New Version Notification for draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04.txt

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 04 July 2014 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE911B2C53 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 01:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50gELZjMAbye for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 01:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11961B2C5D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 01:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404461989; x=1405671589; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=LnO/FsWer3Td9yGSQSlKXxVrRbZdL/T0uqUxOLAkIxc=; b=KNvVwbzI1dCEd7f3prF7o6QVNYVJqogn2B5C3OwdEXPsnYU7AGWvNSl4 JRfF6KRi3/KjeviZ+rB382S33c2vtTaOc8FVzL0bKtcbHXfm4jpNFJty/ ydzyP1wmC1Nbq+wrpdTCSW/ol7QTNKtyIyuCIHk26agQmhThYWwRUuLTA M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIKAJFitlOtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABagw1SUwfGJgGBDBZ1hAMBAQECAncCDAYBCA4DAwECAWAdCAIEAQ0FCYg5CAXKABeObzMHBoQ9BZp2gUiSRIIBgUJsgUQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,599,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="58294238"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2014 08:19:48 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s648Jl7c024182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:19:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.221]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 03:19:47 -0500
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>, Xian Zhang <zhang.xian@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPXwGH7MranCMhykqHuJwx9kdOtZsfos2AgABEzoCAcC4pgA==
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:19:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CFDBDC6D.B992E%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5358122D.1030202@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.242.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <EA19BD2B1C4BF64EBD3F6667EA55EBD1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/E1C1E8Ab0Aab4HsTg7KT9cFBDls
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] New Version Notification for draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 08:19:51 -0000

Hi Lou and WG- 

We have address both (1. To reflect the Informational status; 2. Different
problem space with draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc) comments
from the WG and chairs.

Would you please take a look at
draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04.txt and advise if there is any
outstanding change needed? We believe the draft is ready for the WG
adoption, there is a good support in the meeting for this draft.

Thanks

Regards Š Zafar



-----Original Message-----
From: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:19 PM
To: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>om>, "Gabriele Maria
Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>om>, Xian Zhang
<zhang.xian@huawei.com>om>, zali <zali@cisco.com>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>, DEBORAH BRUNGARD <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for
draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04.txt

>Rakesh,
>    There was some discussion in the last meeting on possible overlap
>between this document and
>draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc.  Have you looked at this
>document and/or discussed potential collaboration with the authors?
>
>Thanks,
>Lou
>On 4/23/2014 11:12 AM, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote:
>> Hi CCAMP WG and Chairs,
>>
>> We have updated the text in the draft to reflect the Informational
>>status
>> as per discussions at the last IETF.
>>
>> We believe the draft is ready for the WG adoption, there was a good
>> support in the meeting for this draft.
>>
>> Please let us know your review comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rakesh 
>>
>> P.S. Minutes from IETF-89
>> --------------------------
>> Draft:
>>           
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-02
>>
>> Presenter:     Zafar Ali
>>           http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/89/slides/slides-89-ccamp-26.pdf
>>
>>           Lou Berger: There is inconsistency between the document and
>>the
>> intended status (informational) as it changes procedures. Either you
>>make
>> it
>>           standard track or change the text and make it informational.
>>
>>           [poll] how many are interested in having it informational?
>>[good
>> support]
>>
>>           Lou Berger: The document needs to be made consistent before we
>> can discuss it further. I suggest making the document informational to
>>be
>>           consistent with the slides.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2014-04-23 10:37 AM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org"
>> <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Name:		draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp
>>> Revision:	04
>>> Title:		RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP
>>> Document date:	2014-04-23
>>> Group:		Individual Submission
>>> Pages:		7
>>> URL:           
>>> 
>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration
>>>-l
>>> sp-04.txt
>>> Status:        
>>> 
>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-ls
>>>p/
>>> Htmlized:      
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04
>>> Diff:          
>>> 
>>>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-ls
>>>p-
>>> 04
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>   In transport networks, there are requirements where Generalized
>>>   Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) end-to-end recovery scheme
>>>   needs to employ restoration Label Switched Path (LSP) while keeping
>>>   resources for the working and/or protecting LSPs reserved in the
>>>   network after the failure.
>>>
>>>   This document reviews how the LSP association is to be provided using
>>>   Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
>>>   signaling in the context of GMPLS end-to-end recovery when using
>>>   restoration LSP where failed LSP is not torn down.  No new procedures
>>>   or mechanisms are defined by this document, and it is strictly
>>>   informative in nature.
>>>
>>>
>>>                
>>>        
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>
>