Re: [CCAMP] Question you raised on failing to assing WA method.

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 22 July 2014 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8461A0ACB for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LU5_rpn5Q0lY for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 04:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A9B21A00E8 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 04:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25696 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jul 2014 11:38:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy3.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2014 11:38:26 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id VVeK1o0092SSUrH01VeNp2; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:38:25 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OcELUHjY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=WrhVjQHxoPwA:10 a=vImR29pegokA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=LiKZIXnkkqPXklbvRosA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=tGgpuCvuCHc/8AVh/1qr9b/3Ekw26qJi2xYR/615lzc=; b=c3Zknhm6Xkjcn2r95nyRgd5BALwVBs2U1V/iHjjfOcPmlJ68Y8+z+YJCAy4Cs7EBqPoFVaKVuxwaMTTnIlEn2Vrow5RJoej/YLEMRFoEIMPV0c3/1ihmClmfldhefaCT;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:45824 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1X9YOi-0006Ie-CA; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:38:20 -0600
Message-ID: <53CE4D36.7090505@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:38:30 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C02FA9@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C02FA9@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/EMUR6V-oITO3Z7gjenGkD9KlAec
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Question you raised on failing to assing WA method.
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:38:30 -0000

Young,
The specific comment was related to the final (and parallel) paragraphs
in section 4.3 and 4.4. They both describe what is done on successful
processing of the related sub-TLV but, unless I missed it, don't
describe how a failure is to be handled.

I some other nits that I'll send out as soon as I get the chance.
(Alternatively, catch me in the hall and I'll review them with you.)

Lou

On 7/21/2014 3:48 PM, Leeyoung wrote:
>
> Hi Lou,
>
> Would you be able to re-phrase what you asked in regard to “what
> happens what wavelength assignment has failed”? Is this the correct
> statement?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Young
>