IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 13 March 2013 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813E41F0C52 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id woJSiT2VMeCd for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.38.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 254231F041A for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11272 invoked by uid 0); 13 Mar 2013 22:27:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2013 22:27:01 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From; bh=Nj3kEKYbOnZdxp3DaAIOlOoqED8d2SQj9cxaWpwrokw=; b=OtH+segsOBBNMD9O4ljEfgGvbneXCgeJWfIoNBeCnjijErgDWIF9iha/M/sP8LOcYV2h373OMTwPbn62HdcRLJvLha2sRAwQ3XuXPfRCIPUTB+ojDiqCrY8YVISo70t9;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:51214 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1UFu8T-000753-0Y; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:27:01 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>, Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:26:55 -0400
Message-ID: <13d65dd005e.2764.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <0182DEA5604B3A44A2EE61F3EE3ED69E1B2BA7D1@BL2PRD0510MB349.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <650AA355E323C34D9D4AAEED952E053D3FB173C6@SV-EXDB-PROD2.infinera.com> <B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F4801C044@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <0182DEA5604B3A44A2EE61F3EE3ED69E1B2BA7D1@BL2PRD0510MB349.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 AquaMail/1.2.2.20 (build: 2100226)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------13d65dd0edfd1b276441fb0ac8"
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:27:24 -0000

John,

Do you have an alternate proposal on how to address the issue, or do 
you just see an issue?

(If the former, the onus will fall on you to provide one.  If the 
latter, it'll fall to Sergio And Danielle to recap the presented issue.)

Lou



On March 13, 2013 6:16:46 PM John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think this is a good idea and I don't see any reason for it.
>
> Irrespectively Yours,
>
> John
>
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
> Of BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:53 AM
> To: Rajan Rao
> Cc: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
> Subject: [CCAMP] R: G.709 signaling - encoding Type
>
> Rao,
>
> it is a proposal: so you should read:  "encoding type can indicate...
>
> Regards
> Sergio
>
> Belotti Sergio-  System Architect
> ALCATE-LUCENT  Optics Division
> via Trento 30 Vimercate (MB) - Italy
> phone +39 (039) 6863033
> ________________________________
> Da: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> 
> [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Rajan Rao
> Inviato: mercoledì 13 marzo 2013 14.40
> A: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>)
> Oggetto: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type
>
> Daniele,
>
> The presentation slide#3 says:  "encoding type indicates AMP or GMP".   
> I don't think this is the case.  We use  G.709 ODUk as encoding type.  
> There is no explicit indication of AMP or GMP there.  Are you proposing 
> to change this?
>
> Note that AMP/GMP can be inferred from Signal Type in traffic param & 
> Length field ( = 8) in the label.
>
> Thanks
> Rajan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email