Re: [CCAMP] Drafted text for the ROADM architecture section (draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02)

"Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBC61200B9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:56:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=WJ6HdhFs; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=SImj/nN0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9K296mdiqYdt for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25481200B4 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:56:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=54922; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1572854184; x=1574063784; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=5z3+H3sKy05AJrxr/g2fpLwprc4Xv4xXA9zmEDnIWrQ=; b=WJ6HdhFsC1uDBDOYm4scpomHoe4PZ19GBROQjgmLtGArOsxOI4IPiCsG 9XyjYm51QpkxaZDIxA81Mrc7VdIDa6Z2ogrNXwu3E5v0gALDkJADRMoR+ mrfB9DJzCqi29Vsu2vL9XhgGIFKK/VA9TdedYfcjpCI1L1ZEgVrdPcpLQ A=;
X-Files: image001.png : 1634
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A+AjJrhfi692GYB9FGSlZoW1klGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGQD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFn?= =?us-ascii?q?pnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/YCMzGMVHXlJN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C2AAAs2b9d/4gNJK1mGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgX2BHC8kLAVsWCAECyqEKYNGA4p0ToI?= =?us-ascii?q?Qf5Z+glIDVAIHAQEBCQECAQEfDgIBAYRAAheDcCQ4EwIDCwEBBAEBAQIBBQR?= =?us-ascii?q?thTcMhVEBAQEBAwUBDBECCAESAQEHMQ0EAQgRAQIBAQEGAQEBGAECBAMCBAU?= =?us-ascii?q?QAQMLDBQDBgoEAREBBggUgko2AYJGAy4BDqU3AoE4iGB1gTKCfgEBBYUYGII?= =?us-ascii?q?QBwkFgTGMExiBQD+BEScfghcHLj6CPCYCAQeBXgMGCQkWgloygiyNFTJfgVi?= =?us-ascii?q?FO4ESjUSCZoYTbgqCJIV5AY88G4I8h1qPT4ozgluBNJlXAgQCBAUCDgEBBYF?= =?us-ascii?q?pIoFYcBVlAYJBCUcRFFeCLziDO4pTdAGBJ41FAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,266,1569283200"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="434817650"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Nov 2019 07:56:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA47u4IR013897 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:56:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:56:03 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:56:02 -0600
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:56:02 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bJD5wP9KztaBF3pJq4It2VdKvXrPg5WMRKTk+xsdQU23w90fbPSQ25mM86EFc5mEbpCCOks4vLDJITaU+SGshXZiZIjeLZkajybPqNqBT/eruf9W9UIZDJADS4GSTowMkjIBoB5kwB2omM/pV9wAjBmzxfvuVsuC5NKUjBlFgF0pd1zpyg/ByjuPox1k1eCE5M09Zv/LGdi5rfrr2gIUWKaLEpmKCoqxM5Glwsd4DsqNatLEHdJICgxzqBVJNrT6iCwg2hBl+ryGY96/Zm4zMRNBcuoUkywt7WkpOlv7od1XfxVjuqS3BcL4EejnG60LzOUojWu79G3s8p+s3ZUYAg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=68h1IiIesRtWBuWmtKK0IiQzenthK7HHTBklVEio10c=; b=KD99msUM8pue+0iw+HY4RDSCbWIeMOmP0KQMyxhadZUgc0KMIDlbAYwzKdT+3Zv7idkDLxBl7qiX5cSIOZJouKaRDjNo7F6nMjUNCtAXKys87HWjLTOAn0Jl5NMl6ebcd1IownD9G7hQRdgM1UYNPgAS201XJNMFTlfFmQ6TpQ1FgEz0+hPVOypbY0+zFf4TQK2Znjxf4LMHe1EnUQ/nh8bRQxnjfMdEyjHktMb++CJRXZhednW1EIvJV4A5SGuQI+bddMxg4JgFTUAJ0C/DUMiUDEDbibx06CxDE0Gx7dG56ZAN6lv3YBNIAd8x8s8QzysSjtr9QHKT4QLLeS4btA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=68h1IiIesRtWBuWmtKK0IiQzenthK7HHTBklVEio10c=; b=SImj/nN0jHKM3meAFx0kr+xRpywXCCtX6188byalsQdK9sBcOPmG9DIv6SxTDlQ3Ky3zVK+wiGXMDaXoEmOcvQCC2hjs56ouYsJqu4LH0ORug/4UNwiuH/Ad1i/qme64BOT4sgMsMjzlQ2zdoVyYQAiX8qyL7YYr3oQ1PY3RRJ4=
Received: from CH2PR11MB4312.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.141.52.216) by CH2PR11MB4199.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.141.52.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2408.24; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:56:01 +0000
Received: from CH2PR11MB4312.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8508:df64:f683:7d]) by CH2PR11MB4312.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8508:df64:f683:7d%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.024; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:56:01 +0000
From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
To: "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Drafted text for the ROADM architecture section (draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02)
Thread-Index: AQHVkuVMW6i8QUsw/kCGlLWd0t0iGA==
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:56:01 +0000
Message-ID: <3D629098-F7C6-4EF3-98B0-0D3CA3D4A3D1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191013
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ggalimbe@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:4491:1300:345c:5599:1d40:65b4]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 85dd7df6-8b8a-487f-4ac5-08d760fc6f88
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CH2PR11MB4199:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CH2PR11MB4199D858AF38B2C3F6BDB7F2CE7F0@CH2PR11MB4199.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0211965D06
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(53754006)(189003)(51914003)(199004)(54896002)(76116006)(6306002)(6512007)(236005)(66946007)(91956017)(606006)(86362001)(478600001)(66476007)(6246003)(58126008)(36756003)(66616009)(99286004)(110136005)(71190400001)(71200400001)(19273905006)(25786009)(316002)(296002)(486006)(256004)(476003)(2616005)(99936001)(7736002)(6116002)(2906002)(790700001)(186003)(33656002)(46003)(102836004)(14454004)(6486002)(229853002)(6436002)(733005)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(8676002)(81156014)(8936002)(81166006)(6506007)(5660300002)(861006)(53546011)(16866085005)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CH2PR11MB4199; H:CH2PR11MB4312.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 1yDiwM5qxNqvbexMvJ0WsVgYwV6Lb9DwV1b+Z77s5dx2hknvVsNe8jkfcb1Rw8z6atjq6jqIwDA1Sp9+wWXu0paUcF/tcJPbTzoFWGnGDm9AmznaWvk1612oYP9fiCjJm/8jv2v7egu68ftAwjZoLu06xTSA1ecGn0IhuwC/eI0xUnIlR46SrY7SZu9JqMrtXyhJFxYU6DaCNF3bMdhElYCvj9bl3wmhfp63eTmZVOennAM5r7iF6QR7nm/6vjOMEdNRCquLXQNlPCZSRPJ8SPN7amSnp7qKPJZpThSHn78G6w9o84bhSMEDRnXeWY7n/7Heq8HDahmTjSpm6yTaCHX2Mi3H1nALx5yIo+rjcuvDj85BwWLZbDmRYmFvRhfMSCVRuEU1+hcdYlGPCizmuGRWDNLy04AlZFMps9QTCySBj1Oa4i7/WlIN35YKr9PyPMCbaVLMhtsdSEB19S4vzNM6LWQlWdYGuGCf60tGNCU=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_3D629098F7C64EF398B00D3CA3D4A3D1ciscocom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 85dd7df6-8b8a-487f-4ac5-08d760fc6f88
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Nov 2019 07:56:01.3843 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: nCPuTldFhK/3Dw3HmseVpXlB99aDms4/XmJ4dT6FeamZ5F0gcMHIqD+tBFWFs9W4mk3whiDeRQSy2qt+/0ADUQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH2PR11MB4199
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.19, xch-rcd-009.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/GK3dwGQYhLDsY06Rg_Pi0fbTg04>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Drafted text for the ROADM architecture section (draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 07:56:28 -0000

Hi Dieter,

Thanks for the new text, I’m OK with it.

Best Regards,

Gabriele

[http://www.cisco.com/swa/i/logo.gif]


Gabriele Galimberti
Principal Engineer
Cisco Photonics Srl
Italy

via S.Maria Molgora, 48 C
20871 - Vimercate (MB)
Italy
www.cisco.com/global/IT/<http://www.cisco.com/global/IT/>

ggalimbe@cisco.com<mailto:ggalimbe@cisco.com>
Phone :+39 039 2091462
Mobile :+39 335 7481947
Fax :+39 039 2092049











From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>; on behalf of Sergio Belotti <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>;
Date: Saturday, 2 November 2019 at 12:05
To: Dieter Beller <dieter.beller@nokia.com>;, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)"; <ccamp@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Drafted text for the ROADM architecture section (draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02)

Hi Dieter,
Thanks for text, I’m fine with that.

Thanks
Sergio

From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 2:12 PM
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>;
Subject: [CCAMP] Drafted text for the ROADM architecture section (draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02)

Hi all,

please find below the text I drafted for draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02 describing the ROADM architectures discussed during our weekly calls.

The ascii-art figures will be provided by Gabriele.

Please send me your comments before Mon, Nov 4 – the submission deadline is rapidly approaching!


Thanks,
Dieter

________________________________

1.8. ROADM Node Architectures
The ROADM node architectures in today’s dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) networks can be categorized as follows:

  *   Integrated ROADM architecture with integrated optical transponders
  *   Integrated ROADM architecture with integrated optical transponders and single channel add/drop ports for remote optical transponders

o   Disaggregated ROADM architecture where the ROADM is subdivided into degree, add/drop, and optical transponder subsystems handled as separate network elements
The TE topology YANG model augmentations including optical impairments for DWDM networks defined below intend to cover all the 3 categories of ROADM architectures listed above. In the case of a disaggregated ROADM architecture, it is assumed that optical domain controller already performs some form of abstraction and presents the TE-node representing the disaggregated ROADM in the same way as an integrated ROADM with integrated optical transponders if the optical transponder subsystems and the add/drop subsystems are collocated (short fiber links not imposing significant optical impairments).
The different ROADM architectures are briefly described and illustrated in the following subsections.
[Editor’s Note: The modeling of remote optical transponders located for example in the client device with a single channel link between the OT and the add/drop port of the ROADM requires further investigations and will be addressed in a future revision of this document.]

1.8.1. Integrated ROADM architecture with integrated transponders
Figure 2 and Figure <RA1> below show the typical architecture of an integrated ROADM node, which contains the optical transponders as an integral part of the ROADM node. Such an integrated ROADM node provides DWDM interfaces as external interfaces for interconnecting the device with its neighboring ROADMs (see OTS link above). The number of these interfaces denote also the degree of the ROADM. A degree 3 ROADM for example has 3 DWDM links that interconnect the ROADM node with 3 neighboring ROADMs. Additionally, the ROADM provides client interfaces for interconnecting the ROADM with client devices such as IP routers or Ethernet switches. These client interfaces are the client interfaces of the integrated optical transponders.

1.8.2. Integrated ROADMs with integrated optical transponders and single channel add/drop interfaces for remote optical transponders
Figure <RA2> below shows the extreme case where all optical transponders are not integral parts of the ROADM but are separate devices that are interconnected with add/drop ports of the ROADM. If the optical transponders and the ROADM are collocated and if short single channel fiber links are used to interconnect the optical transponders with an add/drop port of the ROADM, the optical domain controller may present these optical transponders in the same way as integrated optical transponders. If, however, the optical impairments of the single channel fiber link between the optical transponder and the add/drop port of the ROADM cannot be neglected, it is necessary to represent the fiber link with its optical impairments in the topology model This also implies that the optical transponders belong to a separate TE node [Editor’s Note: this requires further study].

1.8.3. Disaggregated ROADMs that are subdivided into degree, add/drop, and optical transponder subsystems
Recently, some DWDM network operators started demanding ROADM subsystems from their vendors. An example is the OpenROADM project where multiple operators and vendors are developing related YANG models. The subsystems of a disaggregated ROADM are: single degree subsystems, add/drop subsystems and optical transponder subsystems. These subsystems separate network elements and each network element provides a separate management and control interface. The subsystems are typically interconnected using short fiber patch cables and form together a disaggregated ROADM node. This disaggregated ROADM architecture is depicted in Figure <RA3> below.
As this document defines TE topology YANG model augmentations [TE-TOPO] for the TE topology YANG model provided at the north-bound interface of the optical domain controller, it is a valid assumption that the optical domain controller abstracts the subsystems of a disaggregated ROADM and presents the disaggregated ROADM in the same way as an integrated ROADM hiding all the interconnects that are not relevant from an external TE topology view.