Re: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Thu, 21 March 2013 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C35B1F0D21 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-5ApsZAX4RY for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606B51F0D1C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12084; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363832715; x=1365042315; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=np9sYyrGfr1o9G/Mvsq+71UbtwsqCrBBIZW2I6O8Jns=; b=C/hRL095VrgiWxvIPd7xw2eOcG7JgRERnKh984QrgaecSa9lpR6zhXc3 9e9YK+eZhCWiT/V3ZQvu928Jb5t6Bzs/0t8/AMbWxvKT5SQkK/rIJqTH+ uMAIBLIsCrOAcGXOkr+vky+xXU8ZbW63TW6Onawvsv/IEIGMNU1dqi6qm Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAJFuSlGtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABDhA/BLIFXFnSCJAEBAQQtTA4EAQgRAwEBAQsdIhcUCQgBAQQBDQUIiAzCYASOWyARBgGCX2EDp2KDCoIo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,881,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="189767571"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2013 02:25:14 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2L2PExw000822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:25:14 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.51]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:25:14 -0500
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>, Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type
Thread-Index: Ac4f730w+kanHgoHRT6IT+v/deGh0gAAjgiAABGq7AABatQIAA==
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:25:13 +0000
Message-ID: <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B6B36F@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0182DEA5604B3A44A2EE61F3EE3ED69E1B2BA7D1@BL2PRD0510MB349.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.246.84]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B6B36Fxmbrcdx14ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:25:18 -0000

Hi:

Yes, I agree with John/ Rajan; overloading encoding type is not a good idea.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: "jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>" <jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>>
Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:16 PM
To: "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>>, Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com<mailto:rrao@infinera.com>>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type

Hi,

I don’t think this is a good idea and I don’t see any reason for it.

Irrespectively Yours,

John

From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:53 AM
To: Rajan Rao
Cc: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>)
Subject: [CCAMP] R: G.709 signaling - encoding Type

Rao,

it is a proposal: so you should read:  “encoding type can indicate…

Regards
Sergio

Belotti Sergio-  System Architect
ALCATE-LUCENT  Optics Division
via Trento 30 Vimercate (MB) - Italy
phone +39 (039) 6863033
________________________________
Da:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Rajan Rao
Inviato: mercoledì 13 marzo 2013 14.40
A: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>)
Oggetto: [CCAMP] G.709 signaling - encoding Type

Daniele,

The presentation slide#3 says:  “encoding type indicates AMP or GMP”.   I don’t think this is the case.  We use  G.709 ODUk as encoding type.  There is no explicit indication of AMP or GMP there.  Are you proposing to change this?

Note that AMP/GMP can be inferred from Signal Type in traffic param & Length field ( = 8) in the label.

Thanks
Rajan